About this trial
The purpose of this randomized-controlled study is to compare outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a Bioinductive Implant (study group) to standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (control group). The primary outcome of this study is rotator cuff repair integrity (absence of full- or partial-thickness defect) demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that the study group will have higher rates of repair integrity demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Indicated and scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Full-thickness medium (1-3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons demonstrated on magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging.
Chronic, degenerative rotator cuff tears.
Ability to read and understand English.
Disqualifiers
Patient scheduled for open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
Prior surgery of affected shoulder (except diagnostic arthroscopy)
Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
Small (<1 cm) rotator cuff tears
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Procedure/SurgeryThis procedure is the standard of care for rotator cuff tears who fail conservative treatment options.
Bioinductive implant
Biological/VaccineA bioinductive implant that is designed to promote healing of the torn rotator cuff tendon after surgery.
Ultrasound Imaging
Diagnostic testAn ultrasound will be performed on each patient one year postoperatively.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Rotator cuff repair integrity
absence of full- or partial-thickness defect as demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Secondary outcomes
PROMs scores for upper extremity function
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity function. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 0 - 100-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 0 representing the minimum, and 100 representing the maximum function.
PROMs scores for depression
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for depression. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher increased depression (worse).
PROMs scores for upper extremity pain interference
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity pain and how it interferes with the patients daily life. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher pain interference (worse).
Shoulder Range of Motion
Standard range of motion values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.