BMT-08: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Transdermal Granisetron to Ondansetron

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorUniversity of Illinois at Chicago

About this trial

Patients undergoing either an autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and receiving preparative chemotherapy experience a considerable amount of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Current strategies at reducing CINV in this patient population are suboptimal due to lack of efficacy and supportive evidence, potential for increased adverse events, and drug-drug and drug-disease contraindications.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18-75 years at time of enrollment receiving either a preparative regimen and either an autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant.

No vomiting ≤ 24 hours prior to registration

No treatment with an antipsychotic agent such as risperidone, quetiapine, clozapine, phenothiazine or butyrophenone for ≤ 30 days' prior registration or planned during protocol therapy. No patients will be removed from these treatments for study enrollment purposes.

No chronic phenothiazine administration as an antipsychotic agent (patients may receive prochlorperazine and other phenothiazines as rescue antiemetic therapy). No patients will be removed from these treatments for study enrollment purposes.

Disqualifiers

Concurrent use of amifostine

Known hypersensitivity to granisetron patch or ondansetron

Patients with a history of long QT syndrome or Torsade de Pointes

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Granisetron Transdermal Patch

    Drug

    Antiemetic

  • Intravenous Dexamethasone

    Drug

    Antiemetic

  • Ondansetron

    Drug

    ondansetron

Treatment groups

90 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm 1Active comparator 2 interventions
Group B: ARM 2Active comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue medications) during the acute period (0-24 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Efficacy of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone versus Transdermal Granisetron and Dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting during the acute period (0 - 24 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Time frame
0 hours to 24 hours post-chemotherapy

Secondary outcomes

1

To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue medications) during the delayed period (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Efficacy of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone versus Transdermal Granisetron and Dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting during the delayed period (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Time frame
24 hours to 120 hours post-chemotherapy
2

To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue medications) during the overall period (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Efficacy of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone versus Transdermal Granisetron and Dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting during the overall period (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Time frame
24 hours to 120 hours post-chemotherapy
3

To compare between the two study arms, the use of rescue anti-emetic medications (during and for 7 days after the preparative regimen) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Comparing the use of rescue anti-emetic medications between the two arms during and up to 7 days after the preparative regimen

Time frame
Up to 7 days after the preparative regimen
4

To compare between the two study arms the occurrence of CINV complete protection for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Complete protection is defined as no emetic episode, no use of rescue medications and no nausea, during the acute, delayed, and overall phases

Time frame
Up to 21 - 37 days post-HSCT

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.