About this trial
The study proposes a planned, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial involving patients with febrile neutropenia and risk of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) infection. The goal is:
\- Analyze the efficacy and tolerability of Ceftolozane/tazobactam (CEF/TAZ) compared to the current standard of care (meropenem) in patients with febrile neutropenia and risk of ESBL infection.
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive CEF/TAZ or meropenem, with assessment of clinical response, toxicity and microbiological evolution. Stool samples will be collected before, during and after treatment for intestinal microbiota analysis and intestinal microbiome analysis to evaluate possible effects on GVHD. Analysis of the results will include the taxonomic classification of the organisms present. Data will be analyzed to assess non-inferiority in clinical response, incidence of GVHD, antimicrobial resistance and other outcomes.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
Patients known to be colonized with carbapenem-resistant or CEF/TAZ-resistant pathogens
Patients with previous use of carbapenems for at least 48h in the past 30 days are also excluded due to risk of resistance to the study drugs.
Growth of a pathogen resistant to either study drug in a relevant clinical specimen during the intervention phase will be followed by adjustment of therapy according to local protocol, unblinding, and exclusion from the study.
Patients that have received less than 72h of either study drug will also be excluded from the final analyses.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Ceftolozane-Tazobactam
DrugIn the intervention arm 3g of ceftolozane-tazobactam are given intravenously every 8 hours. Duration of therapy should follow local guidelines and de-escalation is allowed after identification of causative pathogens.
Meropenem
DrugThe comparator arm consists of 2g of meropenem given intravenously every 8 hours.Duration of therapy should follow local guidelines and de-escalation is allowed after identification of causative pathogens.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Percentage of Participants with regards to clinical failure of antimicrobial therapy at the End-of-Therapy (EOT) Visit in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
To compare the clinical response rates at the EOT visit for ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem. Clinical response at the EOT visit was defined as cure (complete resolution of fever and symptoms related to Febrile Neutropenia episode), failure (non-resolution, relapse or recurrence of Febrile Neutropenia) or indeterminate (no evaluable study data). A favorable clinical response is a clinical cure. A missing clinical response will be considered indeterminate.
Secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at the End-of-Therapy (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population
To compare the clinical response rates at the EOT visit for ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population. Clinical response at the EOT visit was defined as cure (complete resolution of fever and symptoms related to Febrile Neutropenia episode), failure (non-resolution, relapse or recurrence of Febrile Neutropenia) or indeterminate (no evaluable study data). A favorable clinical response is a clinical cure. A missing clinical response will be considered indeterminate.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response of Clinical Cure at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
To demonstrate the non-inferiority of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem in participants with Febrile Neutropenia on Patients Colonized With or at Risk for Infection With Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase - Producing Pathogens at the TOC visit (7 to 14 days after the end-of-therapy \[EOT\] visit) using a non-inferiority margin of 12.5%. Clinical response at the TOC visit was defined as cure (complete resolution of fever and symptoms related to Febrile Neutropenia), failure (non-resolution, relapse or recurrence of Febrile Neutropenia) or indeterminate (no evaluable study data). A favorable clinical response is a clinical cure. A missing clinical response will be considered indeterminate unless the clinical outcome at the EOT visit was failure.
Incidence of microbiologically documented infections and identification of causative organisms in culture
The incidences of microbiologically documented infections, along with the identification of causative organisms in culture, will be recorded. The measure will be assessed through the counting of cases confirmed by positive cultures.
In-hospital mortality
In-hospital mortality in the first 100 days after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Collaborator