Comparative Effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis(UPFRONT)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorYongquan Shi

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn comparative effectiveness and safety of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Whether upadacitinib can effectively induce remission in acute severe ulcerative colitis with an efficacy non-inferior to that of corticosteroids. 2. What adverse reactions may occur with upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis?

Researchers will compare upadacitinib with corticosteroids to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis.Participants will:

1. Upadacitinib group: Upadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then adjusted to 30 mg once daily. 2. Corticosteroid group: Methylprednisolone for injection 60 mg/day. If clinical response is achieved, switch to oral prednisone acetate tablets after 5 days (calculated at 0.75 mg/kg/day), followed by a weekly prednisone taper of 5 mg. When the dose is reduced to 20 mg, taper by 2.5 mg weekly until discontinued, with mesalazine 4 g/day as maintenance therapy. 3. Take drug Upadacitinib or Corticosteroid every day for 3 months 4. Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests 5. Record the patient's bowel movements and the presence of symptoms such as abdominal pain, while performing colonoscopy, ultrasound examination, and blood tests at the specified time points.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients diagnosed with ASUC

Aged 18 years or older.

No gender restriction.

Disqualifiers

Presence of contraindications, allergy, or intolerance to upadacitinib or glucocorticoids.

Patients requiring immediate colectomy; diagnosis of Crohn's disease; confirmed intestinal infection; hemodynamic instability; clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection; current malignancy.

Presence of severe underlying systemic diseases involving the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, hematologic system, or other organ systems.

Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Upadacitinib

    Drug

    Safety and efficacy of the drug

  • Corticosteroid

    Drug

    Safety and efficacy of the drug

Treatment groups

46 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Upadacitinib groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Corticosteroid groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Primary Outcome Measure

clinical response by day 7 (defined as a reduction in Lichtiger score to \<10 points with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day).

Time frame
The primary outcome was assessed by the investigator between days 3 and 7, with patients recorded as clinical responders if they had the primary outcome on any day in this assessment window.

Secondary outcomes

1

clinical response by day 14

Defined as mayo score decrease of ≥30% and ≥3 points from baseline, accompanied by a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.

Time frame
day 14
2

clinical remission by day 28, day 42, and day 90

Total Mayo score ≤2 points and no individual subscore \>1 point.

Time frame
day 28, day 42, and day 90
3

Endoscopic response by day 90

A decrease in MES score of ≥1 point, or a decrease of ≥50% from baseline.

Time frame
day 90
4

Endoscopic remission by day 90

MES score ≤1

Time frame
day 90

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Yongquan Shi

Lead sponsor

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Sponsor institution