About this trial
The investigator team proposes a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparative effectiveness trial conducted in two urban emergency departments (EDs) in the Bronx, New York. This study is designed to determine the relative efficacy of IV acetaminophen compared to PO acetaminophen in treating pelvic pain. This design focuses on the early onset of action and short-term efficacy, which may better capture potential differences between IV and PO acetaminophen in the acute ED setting.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Female sex at birth
Presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) with pelvic pain
Baseline numeric pain score (NRS) ≥4
Ability to provide informed consent in English or Spanish
Disqualifiers
Receipt of any analgesic medication within 2 hours or acetaminophen within 6 hours
Known allergy or intolerance to acetaminophen
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Acetaminophen 1000mg PO
DrugOral Acetaminophen 1000mg
IV Acetaminophen 1000mg
DrugIntravenous Acetaminophen 1000mg
IV Placebo
Other interventionIV placebo administration
PO Placebo
Other interventionOral placebo administration
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Mean Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score
Mean Change in NRS score will be assessed at 30 minutes post-treatment. The NRS is a patient self-assessment pain scale that instructs patients to use a facial grimace scale ranging from 0-10 rating to express pain intensity, wherein 0 is "No pain" and 10 is "Worst pain possible," such that higher scores are indicative of greater pain intensity. For purposes of the primary outcome change in NRS score from baseline will be assessed. Results will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.
Secondary outcomes
Pain Intensity
Participants will be asked to serially assess their current level of pain intensity as either "Severe," "Moderate," "Mild," or "None." Categorical assessments of pain intensity will be summarized by study arm at each prespecified timepoint.
Time to Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain
Time to clinically meaningful pain reduction as assessed by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a pain scale that uses a 0-10 rating to measure pain intensity, where 0 is "No pain" and 10 is "Worst pain possible." Clinically meaningful pain reduction will be defined as achieving a reduction in NRS score of ≥1.3 from baseline. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Use of Rescue Medications
The number/percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesia of any type within 120 minutes will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score
Effectiveness of treatment will be evaluated using the PGI-C scale. The PGI-C scale is a 7-point self-reported scale used to assess the patient's perception of change in condition/health status following treatment. Patients will provide a single response as to their self-perception of change in condition/health status on a scale ranging from 1 ("Very much improved") to 7 ("Very much worse)" with 4 representing "No change" as the midpoint. Lower scores are indicative of an improved self-assessment of condition following treatment. Scores will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: