Comparison Between Palpatory and Ultrasound-guided Methods for Botulinum Toxin Administration in Spastic Paraplegia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversidade Federal Fluminense

About this trial

Spasticity in spastic paraplegia is a major cause of chronic pain and functional limitation. Although botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) reduces muscle tone, studies like the SPASTOX trial have shown limited functional improvement, which may be related to injection accuracy in deep or complex muscle groups. Ultrasound guidance enhances injection precision, potentially improving clinical outcomes. This prospective, single-group, fixed-sequence crossover study ($N = 40$) aims to compare the response to BoNT-A in patients with spastic paraplegia (all etiologies included). Participants will receive treatment in two distinct phases separated by a 16-week washout period: first with conventional anatomical landmark-guided injections, followed by ultrasound-guided injections. A fixed sequence (anatomical first, ultrasound second) is used to prevent observer bias, ensuring the injector remains blinded to muscle ultrasound features (e.g., fatty infiltration or fibrosis) during the landmark-guided phase. Both the participants and the outcome assessor are blinded to the application sequence. Assessments will occur before and 4 weeks after each intervention using validated tools, including the Modified Ashworth Scale, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, modified Barthel Index, SF-36 questionnaire, and the Heckmatt scale. The hypothesis is that ultrasound-guided injections will achieve greater spasticity reduction and functional recovery.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age over 18 years

Clinical diagnosis of spastic paraplegia

Spasticity with Ashworth Scale score between 2 and 3 in at least one muscle group with indication for botulinum toxin treatment

Muscle strength ≥ 3 on the Muscle Strength Assessment Scale

Disqualifiers

Concomitant neuromuscular disorders

History of hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin

Active infection at the injection site

Ashworth Scale score of 4

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AbobotulinumtoxinA - Ultrasound-Guided Technique

    Drug

    Administration of AbobotulinumtoxinA (500U) into spastic lower limb target muscles under real-time ultrasound guidance to ensure precise muscle localization. Performed 16 weeks after the first intervention. Assessments are performed pre-injection and 4 weeks post-injection

  • AbobotulinumtoxinA - Conventional Technique

    Drug

    Administration of AbobotulinumtoxinA (500U) into spastic lower limb target muscles using standard anatomical landmarks and manual palpation. Assessments are performed at baseline and 4 weeks post-injection.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Spastic Paraplegia Cohort (Anatomical Toxin Injection followed by USG-Guided Injection)Experimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in spasticity after BoNT-A injection techniques

Change in spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), comparing conventional landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injections in patients with spastic paraplegia. The Modified Ashworth Scale ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater muscle tone/spasticity (worse outcome)

Time frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after each injection session
2

Functional improvement assessed by Goal Attainment Scaling

Functional improvement assessed by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) after conventional landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injections. The Goal Attainment Scaling score ranges from -2 to +2, with higher scores indicating greater achievement of the predefined treatment goals (better outcome)

Time frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after each intervention
3

Functional mobility assessed by the Timed Up and Go Test

Change in functional mobility measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test, comparing conventional landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injections. The Timed Up and Go Test is measured in seconds, with lower times indicating better functional mobility (better outcome)

Time frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after each intervention
4

Change in functional independence assessed by the Modified Barthel Index

Change in functional independence measured by the Modified Barthel Index, comparing conventional landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injections. The Modified Barthel Index ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater functional independence (better outcome).

Time frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after each intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

Pain intensity after BoNT-A injection techniques

Change in pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity (worse outcome)

Time frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after each intervention
2

Quality of life after BoNT-A injection techniques

Change in quality of life assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The SF-36 assesses eight health domains, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 for each domain. Higher scores indicate better health status (better outcome)

Time frame
Baseline and 4 weeks after each intervention
3

Adverse events related to BoNT-A injection techniques

Incidence and severity of adverse events associated with conventional landmark-guided and ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injections

Time frame
Up to 16 weeks after each injection

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.