About this trial
The primary goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of deutetrabenazine treatment of TD in this previously untreated patient population. Compare movement disorder deutetrabenazine treatment response in persons with IDD to response seen in patients without IDD treated with deutetrabenazine in other treatment settings (per literature review). Compare global deutetrabenazine treatment response with validated instruments.
In addition, we plan to:
* Assess the safety of deutetrabenazine in the treatment of TD in persons with IDD. * Assess change in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in persons with IDD and TD treated with deutetrabenazine, utilizing a validated ADL instrument. * Assess change in Quality of Life (QOL) in persons with IDD and TD treated with deutetrabenazine, utilizing a validated QOL instrument. * Assess caregiver burden with a validated caregiver burden instrument.
In this study, 25 participants with IDD and TD will undergo Deutetrabenazine treatment for 24 weeks. The participants will be seen for a total of 5 visits: at baseline, and at follow up visits at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks.
This study does not include a comparison group. Therefore, researchers will compare the response of the study participants to deutetrabenazine treatment with those from a previous reported work that resulted in the FDA approval of this medication. This will be an open-label, Phase 4 study.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Diagnosis of IDD (IQ < 70; social/adaptive dysfunction, onset < age 22) as per DSM-5
Clinical diagnosis of Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) per DSM-5 for at least 3 months before study inclusion (presence of movement disorder for at least 3 months, in absence of previous formal diagnosis of TD).
Eligible to receive deutetrabenazine, according to current product labeling Stable doses of all psychotropic medications for minimum of three months before study inclusion
Willing to remain on stable doses of all psychotropics for 24 weeks of study. If female of childbearing age, practicing acceptable form of birth control throughout study duration.
Disqualifiers
Previous treatment with a VMAT2 inhibitor (tetrabenazine, valbenazine, or deutetrabenazine).
Treatment with any investigational drug in the 30 days prior to study entry.
Currently taking a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor such as fluoxetine, paroxetine, quinidine, bupropion. Current treatment with strong anticholinergic agents, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, metoclopramide, dopamine agonists, L-DOPA, or stimulants within past 30 days, or botulinum toxin within the past 3 months.
Any unstable medical condition in the 60 days prior to study entry.
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Deutetrabenazine Oral Capsule
DrugOpen-label twenty-four-week treatment with Deutetrabenazine oral tablets (up to 24 mg/day) to test the safety and effectiveness of this medication in ameliorating the signs of tardive dyskinesia in persons with intellectual disability.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in AIMS total scores of items 1-7
The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) has been used for many years as the gold standard for this purpose and the amount of improvement (change in movement intensity, and reduction in AIMS scores) have been assessed clinical significance in rating improvement. A number of authors have noted the difficulty in using the AIMS in persons with IDD who cannot cooperate fully in the examination process. For this reason, some have suggested using videotaped AIMS exams as a methodology for more accurately quantifying change. Videotaping of exams pre- and post-treatment for blind rating of improvement has been a methodology utilized in a number of recent studies of valbenazine. The minimum value of the AIMS total score of items 1-7 is 0 and the maximum value is 49. Higher total AIMS scores mean worse outcomes.
Secondary outcomes
CGI-C
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), as the names indicates, denotes the clinician's impression of change between baseline and after the treatment in which -3 will be marked worsening, -2 moderate worsening, -1 mild worsening, 0 no change, +1 will be marked for mild improvement, +2 moderate improvement, and +3 marked improvement.
CaGI-C
Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CaGI-C). This is similar to the CGI-C, except that this is the impression of the participant's caregiver, -3 will be marked worsening, -2 moderate worsening, -1 mild worsening, 0 no change, +1 will be marked for mild improvement, +2 moderate improvement, and +3 marked improvement.
Change in ABC-I score
The Aberrant Behavioral Checklist, Irritability Subscale (ABC-I) is commonly used in clinical trials. It consists of 15 items, which are scored on a 4-point Likert scale of severity, ranging from "not at all a problem" to "the problem is severe in degree."
Change in W-ADL score
The Waisman Activities of Daily Living (W-ADL) Scale for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities, is a validated scale that consists of 17 items in the final version of the W-ADL pertain to the current or expected performance of the target individual at the time when the survey was given. The target adult's performance of each activity is rated on a 3-point scale (0 = "does not do at all", 1 = "does with help", 2 = "independent"), and item scores are summed to produce an overall score. Therefore, this means that the scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum value of 51. Higher total W-ADL scores mean better outcomes.
Other outcomes
Change Simpson-Angus Scale for EPS
The Simpson-Angus Scale is a tool used to assess the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), which are side effects of antipsychotic medications. The scale consists of ten items that assess five domains: gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, and wrist rigidity or fixation of position. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale of severity (0 = normal; 4 = most severe; NR = not rated). The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe EPS outcome.
Change in Barnes Akathisia Scale
The Barnes Akathisia Scale is a rating scale used to assess the severity of drug-induced akathisia (a syndrome of motor restlessness). It is the most widely used rating scale for akathisia. The scale consists of four items that rate the observable, restless movements that characterize the condition, the subjective awareness of restlessness, and any distress associated with the akathisia. The scale is scored on a 4-point scale from 0-3 and is summed yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 9. The higher the score, the more severe the akathisia, i.e., the worse the outcome.
Assessment of electrocardiogram (EKG)-derived QT/QTc intervals
QTc intervals have clinical importance as a biomarker of potential drug toxicity. QTc intervals ≥ 450 ms are generally considered long, and drug-induced QTc interval prolongations ≥ 60 ms are generally considered clinically relevant.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead sponsor
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA
Collaborator