About this trial
Our aim is to compare the efficacy of 100 mg versus 200 mg rectal indometacin in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) among high-risk patients without no pancreatic stenting. The 100 mg versus 200 mg indometacin trial is a multicentre, single-blind, randomized controlled study. High-risk patients for PEP without pancreatic stent insertion will be informed about the opportunity to participate. A total of 1,036 eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: (1) administration of 100 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (standard-dose group), or (2) administration of 200 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (high-dose group). The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of PEP. Secondary outcomes include hyperamylasemia and other ERCP-related adverse events (AEs).
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
standard-dose group VS high-dose group
DrugA total of 1,036 eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: (1) administration of 100 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (standard-dose group), or (2) administration of 200 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (high-dose group)
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
the incidence and severity of PEP
Patients were identified as post-ERCPpancreatitis if meeting two out of three criteria: pain consistent with acute pancreatitis; amylase or lipase\>3 times normal limit; characteristic findings on imaging, in according to the Revised Atlanta International consensus.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: