Gabapentin vs. Benzonatate vs. Standard of Care for Cough in ILD

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

About this trial

Absence of a clear standard of care and approved drug for chronic cough, the commonest symptom in ILD, calls for further research in this area. In this study, the investigators aim to compare gabapentin and benzonatate treatment with the standard of care for treating chronic cough in ILD. The investigators hypothesize that both gabapentin and benzonatate will be more effective than standard of care in treating chronic cough in ILD.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Established diagnosis of ILD as defined by above

Chronic cough (>= 8 weeks) with NRS ≥ 4/10

On stable treatment for ≥ 8 weeks at screening

Disqualifiers

Acute respiratory infection or ILD exacerbation leading to hospitalization within past 8 weeks of screening.

Exposure to Gabapentin/Benzonatate within past 4 weeks

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Upper airway cough syndrome

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Gabapentin

    Drug

    Gabapentin at starting dose of 100 mg per dose, thrice daily and up titrated by 100 mg per dose every 3 days till 300 mg per dose, thrice daily or maximum tolerated dose

  • Benzonatate 200 mg

    Drug

    Benzonatate at starting dose of 100 mg per dose thrice daily and up titrated to 200 mg per dose thrice daily after 3 days

  • Standard of care treatment for ILD

    Other intervention

    Standard Therapy including immunosuppressive and/or anti-fibrotic agent/s and symptomatic therapy for cough (as needed dextromethorphan lozenges)

Treatment groups

177 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: GabapentinActive comparator 2 interventions
Group B: BenzonatateActive comparator 2 interventions
Group C: SOCOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Cough intensity in Gabapentin group

Difference in change in numerical rating scale (NRS 0-10) for cough from baseline to 8 weeks between the gabapentin and the standard of care groups.The cough numerical rating scale (NRS) is a simple, self-reported tool used to measure chronic cough severity, frequency, or the urge to cough on an 11-point scale from 0 to 10. 0: No cough (or no symptoms at all). 10: The most severe or worst possible cough imaginable. Higher scores: Indicate worse symptoms and greater severity.

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Cough intensity in benzonatate arm

Difference in change in numerical rating scale (NRS 0-10) for cough from baseline to 8 weeks between the benzonatate and the standard of care groups. The cough numerical rating scale (NRS) is a simple, self-reported tool used to measure chronic cough severity, frequency, or the urge to cough on an 11-point scale from 0 to 10. 0: No cough (or no symptoms at all). 10: The most severe or worst possible cough imaginable. Higher scores: Indicate worse symptoms and greater severity.

Time frame
8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Cough VAS in gabapentin group

Difference in the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) score for cough at 8 weeks between gabapentin and standard of care groups. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) is a 100-millimeter linear line that lets patients rate their cough intensity from \[0 mm ("no cough")\] to \[100 mm ("worst imaginable cough")\]. Format: A straight horizontal or vertical line measuring exactly 100 mm long. Anchors: The bottom or left end is marked 0 ("No cough"), and the top or right end is marked 100 ("Worst cough"). Scoring: The patient makes a mark on the line matching their symptom severity, and the distance in millimeters from zero to the mark is measured. Higher scores indicate worse cough.

Time frame
8 weeks
2

Cough VAS in benzonatate arm

Difference in the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) score for cough at 8 weeks between benzonatate and standard of care groups. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) is a 100-millimeter linear line that lets patients rate their cough intensity from \[0 mm ("no cough")\] to \[100 mm ("worst imaginable cough")\]. Format: A straight horizontal or vertical line measuring exactly 100 mm long. Anchors: The bottom or left end is marked 0 ("No cough"), and the top or right end is marked 100 ("Worst cough"). Scoring: The patient makes a mark on the line matching their symptom severity, and the distance in millimeters from zero to the mark is measured. Higher scores indicate worse cough.

Time frame
8 weeks
3

Leicester Cough questionnaire (LCQ) score in gabapentin arm

Difference in the change in leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) total score at 8 weeks between gabapentin and standard of care groups.The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a brief, 19-item self-administered tool used to measure the impact of a chronic cough on an adult's quality of life over the previous two weeks. The questionnaire splits the 19 items into three specific areas of health: Physical (8 items): Evaluates chest or stomach pains, phlegm, hoarseness, sleep disruption, energy levels, and coughing bouts. Psychological (7 items): Measures tiredness, feelings of control, embarrassment, anxiety, frustration, and worry about serious illness. Social (4 items): Assesses interference with jobs, daily enjoyment, conversations, and relationships. Scoring and Interpretation: Scale: Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 to 7). Total Score Range: From 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life and less impact from the cough

Time frame
8 weeks
4

Leicester Cough questionnaire score in the benzonatate arm

Difference in the change in leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) total score at 8 weeks between benzonatate and standard of care groups.The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a brief, 19-item self-administered tool used to measure the impact of a chronic cough on an adult's quality of life over the previous two weeks. The questionnaire splits the 19 items into three specific areas of health: Physical (8 items): Evaluates chest or stomach pains, phlegm, hoarseness, sleep disruption, energy levels, and coughing bouts. Psychological (7 items): Measures tiredness, feelings of control, embarrassment, anxiety, frustration, and worry about serious illness. Social (4 items): Assesses interference with jobs, daily enjoyment, conversations, and relationships. Scoring and Interpretation: Scale: Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 to 7). Total Score Range: From 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life and less impact from the cough

Time frame
8 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: