Head-to-Head Comparison of All Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Products for Glabellar Rhytides

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

About this trial

Study Type: This is a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of all commercially available Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) products for treating glabellar rhytides, commonly known as frown lines. This study is designed to provide comprehensive data on how these treatments compare in terms of improving frown lines and the duration of their effects.

Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer:

Which BoNT-A product provides the longest lasting effect on reducing glabellar rhytides? How do these products compare in terms of safety and the occurrence of side effects?

Participant Tasks:

Women aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe glabellar lines will participate.

Participants will receive injections of a BoNT-A product into specific facial muscles.

They will need to take weekly photographs using their smartphones to document changes in their frown lines.

These photos will be securely sent to our research team for analysis. Participants will complete questionnaires at the start and end of the study to assess their satisfaction, quality of life, and any changes in their condition.

Comparison Group:

Researchers will compare participants receiving different types of BoNT-A products to see which one is more effective at reducing frown lines and maintaining these effects over time.

The safety profiles of these products will also be compared to determine which has the fewest and least severe side effects.

This study aims to fill important gaps in our understanding of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A treatments, guiding more effective clinical decisions and improving patient outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Women aged 18 years or over, with moderate to severe glabellar lines

Willing to provide written informed consent

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification 1 or 2

Negative pregnancy test

Disqualifiers

ASA Classification 3 or over

History of hypersensitivity or adverse reactions to botulinum toxin or any of its components

Infection at the injection site

Previous treatment with botulinum toxin (lifetime)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Botulinum toxin type A

    Drug

    Head-to-head comparison of all commercially available botulinum neurotoxin type A products

Treatment groups

325 Participants
are divided into 5 treatment groups
Group A: OnabotulinumtoxinA: 20 unitsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: IncobotulinumtoxinA: 20 unitsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: AbobotulinumtoxinA: 50 (Speywood) unitsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group D: AbobotulinumtoxinA: 60 (Speywood) unitsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group E: PrabotulinumtoxinA 20 unitsActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Duration of Clinical Efficacy

Period until loss of treatment effect, measured as the percentage of participants who maintain at least a 1-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown from baseline to week 16, assessed using the "four-point clinical severity score for glabellar frown lines" developed by Honeck.

Time frame
From baseline to week 16

Secondary outcomes

1

Duration of Clinical Efficacy

Median time to loss of effect

Time frame
Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the time to complete loss of effect across the entire study duration (From baseline to week 30)
2

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

Occurrences of adverse events such as ptosis, strabismus, and eyelid sensory disorders throughout the study period

Time frame
From baseline to week 16
3

Quality of Life (FACE-Q)

FACE-Q Psychological Wellbeing Scores, (values 10-40), higher score means a better outcome

Time frame
From baseline to week 16
4

Social Functioning (FACE-Q)

FACE-Q Social Scores, (values 8-32), higher score means a better outcome

Time frame
From baseline to week 16

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.