Hypertonic Saline Inhalation for Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorRadboud University Medical Center

About this trial

The SALINE trial will investigate the effect of Hypertonic Saline inhalation plus best supportive care on burden of symptoms, clearance of mycobacteria and functional capacities in participants with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease and compare the effect to treatment with best supportive care alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

International guideline criteria for nodular-bronchiectatic MAC lung disease, i.e. symptomatic, nodular bronchiectatic lesions seen on thorax radiography and ≥2 positive cultures of the same MAC species or one positive culture from a bronchoalveolar lavage;

≥1 positive MAC sputum cultures must be collected in the previous 4 months;

Signed and dated patient informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Fibrocavitary MAC lung disease;

Antimycobacterial treatment in the last 6 months;

Previous MAC lung disease treatment failure, defined as persistent culture positivity despite >6 months of guideline-recommended treatment;

Current clinical relevant asthma or otherwise bronchial hyperresponsiveness that is judged to be a contra-indication for HSi.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Hypertonic Saline inhalation

    Device

    Hypertonic Saline inhalation is thought to increase mucociliary clearance of the airways

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Hypertonic Saline inhalationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Best supportive careNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in health-related quality of life

Measured by the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) with NTM module questionnaire at baseline, after 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The QOL-B asks the participant to subjectively rank their symptoms using a 4 scale base ranging from "a lot of difficulty" to "no difficulty", "always" to "never", "completely true" to "not at all true" and "a lot" to "not at all" for 8 domains: physical/role/emotional/social functioning, vitality, treatment burden, health perception and respiratory symptoms. The NTM-module also asks participants to subjectively rank eating problems, body image, digestive symptoms, and NTM symptoms on a 4 scale base.

Time frame
12 weeks
2

Change in health-related quality of life

Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue 7a short form at baseline, after 4, 8 and 12 weeks. This questionnaire assesses self-reported fatigue over the past seven days on a 5 scale base ranging from never (1) to always (5). The lowest possible raw score (indicating the highest subjective level of fatigue) is 7; and the highest possible raw score (indicating the lowest subjective level of fatigue) is 35.

Time frame
12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Sputum culture conversion

A conversion from positive sputum cultures at baseline to negative sputum cultures after study treatment, defined by two or more negative sputum cultures sampled a week apart.

Time frame
12 weeks
2

Change in semi-quantitative culture results

Change in acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear determined by auramine staining

Time frame
12 weeks
3

Change in semi-quantitative culture results

Change in sputum culture time-to-positivity

Time frame
12 weeks
4

(Serious) Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0

Number and severity of (serious) Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE

Time frame
12 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.