About this trial
To investigate whether dexmedetomidine or propofol is more effective in controlling intracranial pressure (ICP) (assessed via optic nerve sheath diameter "ONSD" as a primary outcome) and which is more effective in suppressing lipid peroxidation (measured via malondialdehyde "MDA" as a secondary outcome). This double-blind randomized controlled trial aims to bridge this research gap by evaluating the biochemical neuroprotective efficacy alongside the clinical outcomes of both agents in TBI patients.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients aged between 18 and 65 years.
Both genders.
Moderate traumatic brain injury with Glasgow coma scale scores between 8 and 12 on admission, with no need for surgical operations.
Requiring continuous sedation for more than 24 hours.
Disqualifiers
History of severe hepatic or renal failure.
Known hypersensitivity to propofol or dexmedetomidine.
Pre-existing severe bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 bpm) or advanced heart block.
Confirmed brain death or moribund patients.
Trial design
Factorial
Treatments tested in this trial
Propofol
Drugevaluate intracranial pressure and serum Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels
Dexmedetomidine
Drugevaluate intracranial pressure and serum Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring by optic nerve sheath diameter measurement.
Secondary outcomes
Serum Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: