Optimal Intravesical Lidocaine Volume for Pain Relief During Office Intra-detrusor Onabotulinum Toxin a Injections

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Louisville

About this trial

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different volumes of bladder-numbing medication for pain relief at the time of office bladder Botox injections. This is a randomized prospective, double-blind superiority trial comparing 200 ml 2% lidocaine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine for office Botox injections.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult female, >18 years, English-speaking (surveys utilized are not validated in all languages)

Able to provide informed consent

Indications: Refractory urge urinary incontinence, Refractory urinary urgency and frequency, Neurogenic bladder (without sensory deficit)

Disqualifiers

Untreated urinary tract infection at the time of procedure

Contra-indication to Botox

Contraindication to intravesical lidocaine

Inability to provide informed consent

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Lidocaine 2% without vessel constrictor

    Drug

    different volumes of intravesical 2% lidocaine without epinephrine, all patients will be receiving bladder botox but this will not be compared

Treatment groups

36 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Higher volume intravesical lidocaineActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Lower volume intravesical lidocaineActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

a. Determine the efficacy of pain relief via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, scored 0-100 on 100 mm scale with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating the worst pain possible) in women randomized to 200 ml 2% lidocaine without epinephrine versus 30 ml 2% lidocaine without epinephrine prior to office intravesical onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) injections i. Perceived maximum VAS during the procedure and post-procedure ii. Superiority limit 20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale

Time frame
on day of enrollment and procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

Likert scale describing current severity of urinary tract condition: 1. Normal, 2. Mild, 3. Moderate, 4. Severe; higher scores indicate worse symptoms

Time frame
through study completion, an average of 1 year
2

Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-Sat-q)

An 11-item questionnaire that assesses patient satisfaction with their overactive bladder (OAB) treatment. It includes three sub-scales (satisfaction, side effects, and endorsement) and two single-item assessments (convenience and preference). Scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with treatment. Used to assess treatment satisfaction over time.

Time frame
This will be assessed pre and post-intervention for all participants through study completion, an average of 1 year
3

Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (PSQ-18)

An 8-item question assessing satisfaction with medical care experience, measured on a Likert scale with 1 "Strongly agree" and 5 "Strongly disagree", for questions 1-3, 5-6, and 8 lower scores indicate higher satisfaction. For questions 4 and 7 lower scores indicate dissatisfaction.

Time frame
through study completion, an average of 1 year
4

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

7-point Likert scale with 1 indicating "Very much better" and 7 indicating "Very much worse", lower scores indicate more improvement

Time frame
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: