Pain Injection Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Pediatric Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeUp to 18
SponsorUniversity of California, Los Angeles

About this trial

Pain management in pediatric patients presents a difficult challenge. Unlike adults, pediatric patients often cannot communicate their pain management needs clearly. This is especially true in patients with cerebral palsy (CP), who often have concomitant developmental delay, intellectual disability and verbal limitations. Current literature indicates pain as a common experience for children with CP but has been understudied in this population. Moreover, inadequate post-operative pain control can result in negative physiologic and psychological complications and lead to poor surgical outcomes. Currently, perioperative pain management following orthopaedic procedures in pediatric patients follows traditional protocols that rely on the administration of opioid medications despite their known adverse side effects including nausea, vomiting, itching, constipation, urinary retention, confusion, and respiratory depression.

Epidural anesthesia is a key modality in traditional pain management for pediatric patients with CP given its proven efficacy in decreasing pain and managing spasticity. Yet, administering epidural anesthesia in this patient population poses several risks including damage to preexisting intrathecal baclofen pumps, iatrogenic infection, and technically demanding insertion given high rates of concomitant neuromuscular scoliosis. Alternatively, multimodal analgesic injections theoretically offer an efficacious adjunct to traditional pain management protocols with a lower risk profile. Preliminary data from our study group's pilot randomized control trial comparing the safety and efficacy of a multimodal surgical site injection to placebo showed decreased pain scores and narcotic consumption postoperatively in this patient population. Based on these promising results, the objective of this randomized control trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal surgical site injection compared to epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain control following operative management of hip dysplasia in pediatric patients with CP.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

under 18 years old

diagnosis of cerebral palsy or similar neuromuscular disease

undergoing uni- or bilateral proximal femoral osteotomy

Disqualifiers

ongoing preoperative opioid use

history of allergic reaction to any component of the pain injection

history of adverse reaction to epidural anesthesia

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ropivacaine injection

    Drug

    The local anesthetic group will be injected with ropivacaine 2mg/mL (3mg/kg), epinephrine 1mg/mL (0.5mg), and ketorolac 30mg/mL (0.5mg/kg). The maximum dose of ropivacaine regardless of patient weight will be 200mg. This is based on recommended maximum dose protocols from our anesthesia colleagues. If bilateral hips are involved, the total amount will be split evenly between the two sides.

  • Bupivacaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine

    Drug

    The lumbar epidural group will receive a combination of either/or bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ropivacaine, which will be monitored by the anesthesia team.

Treatment groups

90 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Pain InjectionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: EpiduralActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Average postoperative narcotic consumption measured in morphine equivalents per kilograms of patient body weight

This describes one outcome measure where the amount of opiates consumed will be expressed in morphine equivalents divided by the body weight of patients measured in kilograms.

Time frame
First 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Postoperative pain scores measured by Visual Analogue Scale/Faces Pain Scale/Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale

Pain score assessments will be completed in the post-anesthesia care unit, and every 4 hours following the surgical procedure. Scores will be collected by nursing staff on the inpatient ward and recorded in the electronic medical record. The type of pain score collection will vary based on patient age and level of intellectual disability. In verbal children, either the Visual Analogue Scale or Faces Pain Scale will be employed. In non-verbal children, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale will be employed. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Both scales are from 0 (minimum) -10 (maximum), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicate maximal pain.

Time frame
2-4 days
2

Hospital length of stay measured in days

Postoperative hospital length of stay

Time frame
2-4 days
3

Parent satisfaction measured on a scale of 1-5

Parent satisfaction will be based on a standardized, validated questionnaire taken by parents in person at the first post-operative clinic visit aimed to assess their satisfaction with their child's pain management peri-operatively. Each question is answered with a score of either 1-5, with 1 being the best outcome and 5 being the worst outcome. The score for each question will be summed together to come up with a total score. A higher total score indicates a worse level of satisfaction with perioperative pain management.

Time frame
2-3 weeks postoperatively

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of California, Los Angeles

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Collaborator