About this trial
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colon polyps and perform excision to the polyps to prevent colon cancer. However, delayed polypectomy bleeding is one of the complications to be noticed, which has an occurrence rate of about 1-2%, especially large polyps over 1cm with hot snare polypectomy. Colonoscopic clipping was applied for the treatment of bleeding. However, prophylactic clipping after polypectomy was not proved to reduce the rate of delayed polypectomy bleeding. Sucralfate is used for peptic ulcer treatment, which can become a protective layer on the wound to prevent environmental injury. Our preliminary data revealed the endoscopic sucralfate spray could reduce the delayed bleeding rate among general populations. Whether sucralfate can prevent polypectomy wounds from delayed bleeding in high-risk polyps is unknown.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy in reducing delayed bleeding rate between sucralfate administration and prophylactic clipping on high-risk polypectomy wounds.
Method: This is a randomized clinical trial. The study will recruit 160 patients. After randomization, 80 patients will be classified into the Sucralfate group and 80 into the Clipping group. The participants will receive an endoscopic survey as routine, and we will enroll all patients who take antiplatelets or anticoagulants with polyp size ≥ 1 cm after hot snare polyp excision. Exclusion criteria include patients with an allergy to sucralfate. If immediate polypectomy bleeding occurs, we will apply standard endoscopic therapy by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, and/or hemoclipping. After then, we will spray 3g of sucralfate powder through colonoscopy precisely on the polypectomy wound in the Sucralfate group, and prophylactic clipping will be placed on the polypectomy wound in the Clipping group. All enrolled patients will be monitored for delayed bleeding for 28 days after the colonoscopy.
Expected results and clinical importance:
This study is expected to find that the use of sucralfate powder can more effectively reduce the bleeding risk in high-risk wounds compared to prophylactic clips. In addition to promoting the implementation of national health policies and reducing public exposure to the risk of complications, it can also help avoid medical expenses resulting from complications.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
patients who take antiplatelets or anticoagulants with large polyps (size ≥ 1 cm)
Disqualifiers
lacked complete data (serum creatinine, platelet count, and prothrombin time) pertaining to the previous 6 months
those who did not discontinue or inadequately discontinued antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants
those who had a known allergy to sucralfate
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Sucralfate
Drug3 g of sucralfate powder will be sprayed on the polypectomy wounds of patients in the Sucralfate group.
Clip
DeviceProphylactic clips will be placed on the polypectomy wounds of patients in the Clipping group
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Rate of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding was defined as the need for reintervention or hospitalization, indicating a clinically significant bleeding event
Secondary outcomes
Rate of overt bloody stool
Overt bloody stool with spontaneous bleeding cessation was regarded as minor bleeding
Rate of severe bleeding from polypectomy wounds
bleeding from polypectomy wounds necessitating transarterial embolization or emergency surgery
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: