Prevention of Infection of the Respiratory Tract Through Application of Non-Invasive Methods of Secretion Suctioning

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHospital San Carlos, Madrid

About this trial

Adults who are unconscious or severely ill and need a breathing tube connected to a ventilator are at high risk of developing a lung infection (pneumonia) within the first few days in the intensive care unit. This early pneumonia affects up to 30 to 50 % of certain high-risk patients, prolongs the time on the ventilator and in hospital, and increases the use of antibiotics.

Two strategies are commonly used today to try to prevent this infection: a short, three-day course of an intravenous antibiotic, and removal of secretions from the airway with a sterile suction catheter. Both have limitations - antibiotics can favour the growth of resistant bacteria, and catheter suctioning is uncomfortable and may injure the airway.

PIRÁMIDES is a small (60-patient) pilot study that compares the current practice with two non-invasive, mechanical alternatives for keeping the airway clear: a continuous low-pressure suction system built into a special breathing tube, and a device that produces a gentle, programmed "artificial cough" through the ventilator. Adult patients who are intubated for severe trauma, severe brain injury, stroke, resuscitated cardiac arrest or other causes of decreased consciousness are randomly assigned, in equal numbers, to one of the three approaches and followed for 14 days, with a final visit at day 90.

The main goal is to find out which of the three strategies best prevents early pneumonia, and which provides the best overall result for patients when survival, severity of infection, need for additional antibiotics and side effects are considered together. To make these comparisons as fair as possible in an open-label study, an independent committee of doctors not involved in patient care reviews each suspected pneumonia case without knowing which strategy the patient received. The results will help design a larger trial to confirm which approach is safest and most effective for preventing early pneumonia in critically ill patients on a ventilator.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Endotracheal intubation with an anticipated duration > 48 hours.

Severe trauma.

Severe traumatic brain injury.

Ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.

Disqualifiers

Intubation with an anticipated duration < 48 hours.

Foreseeable ominous prognosis within < 7 days.

Already established indication for systemic antibiotic therapy, either for suspected aspiration pneumonia with radiological pulmonary infiltrate or for suspected non-respiratory source infection.

Active haemoptysis or pulmonary haemorrhage.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • airway clearance

    Device

    mechanical suctioning of airway secretions by creating a high expiratory peak flow

  • subglottic secretion aspiration

    Device

    A specialized endotracheal tube with an aspiration channel dragging secretions accumulating above the cuff

  • Ceftriaxone 2 grams daily

    Drug

    standard of care for prevention of early VAP according to Spanish recommendations (Zero Pneumonia Project)

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Standard of CareActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Cough SimulatorExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: subglottic secretion aspirationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence density of Respiratory tract infection per 1000 days of intubation

ventilator-associated pneumonia or tracheobronchitis

Time frame
inclusion to day 14

Secondary outcomes

1

Desirability of Outcome Ranking

Global ordinal comparison of the five DOOR categories across the three arms

Time frame
Outcome category asigned at Day 14
2

Systemic antibiotic use

Number of patients needing antibiotic therapy for respiratory tract infection and antimicrobial DDDs

Time frame
inclusion to day 14
3

Incidence and type of Bacterial resistance

Identification of resistance bacteria in respiratory tract samples

Time frame
14 days
4

bacterial tracheobronchitis

Diagnostic criteria for VAP without lung infiltrate nor significant worsening of oxygenation

Time frame
From inclusion to day 14

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

Lead sponsor

SAMUR-Protección Civil, Madrid, Spain

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: