About this trial
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequent in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Pharmacologic prophylaxis is sometimes contraindicated, and mechanical prophylaxis is used. The primary objective of the study is to compare Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) with conventional mechanical prophylaxis for the prevention of VTE in patients in the ICU.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients > 18 years old in ICU
PADUA score> 4 (medical patients) and/or Caprini score> 3 (surgical patients)
Contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis or indication to combined (pharmacological and mechanical VTE prophylaxis)
Disqualifiers
Patients < 18 years old in ICU
Unable to use mechanical prophylaxis due to trauma, burns, fracture, or problems in inferior members that prevent the use of mechanical prophylaxis
Life expectations less than 24 hours
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Experimental: Hyperslim
DeviceThe PEMF will be carried out using the Hyperslim® device. The Hyperslim® device is produced by Medical San (Lageado, RS, Brazil).
Active Comparator #1
DeviceThe intermittent pneumatic compression group will use the devices Covidien Kendall SCD 700® (Cardinal Health) or Doctor Life 2600® (Venosan).
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Primary efficacy outcome
The primary outcome is a composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE (detected by mandatory Doppler ultrasound 24-48 hours after the end of mechanical prophylaxis or PEMF and on day 30 post-randomization) and death due to pulmonary embolism.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Science Valley Research Institute
Lead sponsor
Hospital Vera Cruz
Collaborator