About this trial
Depression in childhood and adolescence is a serious and increasing public-health problem associated with profound short- and long-term consequences, including impaired social and educational functioning, increased risk of somatic illness and substance use, and elevated mortality from suicide. Up to half of depressive disorders beginning in youth persist into adulthood, and the COVID-19 pandemic, with its attendant social isolation, has further increased the incidence of clinically significant depressive illness in children and young adults. Despite the high burden of disease, pharmacotherapeutic guidance for pediatric depression remains limited. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are first-line agents, yet dosing recommendations for youth do not adequately account for major sources of variability such as developmental pharmacokinetics, body size, age, comorbid diagnoses, and pharmacogenetic differences. Fluoxetine is commonly recommended in pediatric populations largely for historical reasons, while newer SSRIs such as escitalopram and sertraline are increasingly prescribed off-label without robust comparative evidence. This randomized clinical trial evaluates therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided treatment with fluoxetine, sertraline, or escitalopram in children and adults diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder. TDM procedures will be implemented across all randomized arms to capture drug exposure and enable dose adjustments according to predefined safety and efficacy criteria. Treatments will be initiated at the lower end of recommended pediatric doses and titrated if prespecified clinical nonresponse or tolerability thresholds are met, allowing evaluation of dose-response dynamics while prioritizing patient safety. The study combines prospective, randomized comparative effectiveness methodology with intensive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) assessment. Repeated plasma concentration measurements will be collected at multiple timepoints to characterize within- and between-patient PK variability for each SSRI. Standardized clinical instruments will be used longitudinally to assess depressive symptom severity, response and remission rates, time to onset of therapeutic effect, adverse events (including early activation and worsening of suicidal ideation), treatment adherence, and functional outcomes (academic performance, social functioning, and quality of life). Pharmacogenetic testing will be performed to evaluate the contribution of genetic variants (including but not limited to CYP enzymes, serotonin transporter and MAO-A related polymorphisms) to PK parameters and clinical response. Integrated population PK and PK/PD modeling will (1) quantify concentration-effect and concentration-adverse-effect relationships over time, (2) identify demographic, clinical and genetic moderators of exposure and response, (3) evaluate nonlinearity in PK (e.g., dose-dependent absorption or clearance patterns), and (4) derive evidence-based therapeutic concentration ranges and individualized dosing algorithms for pediatric practice. Secondary objectives include head-to-head comparison of efficacy, tolerability, time to response, and persistence on treatment between the three SSRIs, as well as exploratory analyses of diagnostic subtypes and comorbidities that may influence outcomes. By filling critical gaps in controlled PK/PD data for the most commonly prescribed SSRIs in youth, this trial aims to move beyond meta-analytic inference toward actionable, individualized dosing recommendations. The expected outcomes are earlier identification of atypical pharmacokinetics, safer and more effective dose optimization, reduced adverse events and early discontinuation, shortened time to symptomatic improvement, and ultimately improved functional recovery and quality of life for children and young adults with depression. The study's translational PK/PD outputs will inform clinical TDM protocols, pediatric dosing guidelines, and future precision-medicine strategies in adolescent psychopharmacology.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Male or female gender.
Age 12 years or older.
Diagnosis of moderate or severe depressive episode requiring SSRI treatment (fluoxetine, escitalopram, or sertraline).
Written informed consent provided by patient and/or legal guardian.
Disqualifiers
Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy.
Diagnosis of other mental disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, intellectual disability).
Decompensated severe somatic disorders (e.g., endocrine disorders, asthma exacerbation, hepatic/renal failure).
Treatment with fluoxetine, sertraline, or escitalopram at an adequate dose for at least 4 weeks for the current episode (unless washout of 5x half-life is observed).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Fluoxetine
DrugOral fluoxetine administered once daily in the morning. Dosing is stratified by age: Children/adolescents (12-17 years) and elderly (\>64 years) start at 10 mg/day; adults (18-64 years) start at 20 mg/day. If clinical improvement is \<25% after 3 weeks, the dose is escalated to 20 mg/day for children/elderly and 40 mg/day for adults. Treatment duration is 8 weeks, with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) performed weekly to assess plasma concentrations.
Escitalopram
DrugOral escitalopram administered once daily in the morning. Dosing is stratified by age: Children/adolescents (12-17 years) and elderly (\>64 years) start at 5 mg/day; adults (18-64 years) start at 10 mg/day. If clinical improvement is \<25% after 3 weeks, the dose is escalated to 10 mg/day for children/elderly and 20 mg/day for adults. Treatment duration is 8 weeks, with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) performed weekly to assess plasma concentrations.
Sertralin
DrugOral sertraline administered once daily in the morning. Dosing is stratified by age: Children/adolescents (12-17 years) and elderly (\>64 years) start at 25 mg/day; adults (18-64 years) start at 50 mg/day. If clinical improvement is \<25% after 3 weeks, the dose is escalated to 50 mg/day for children/elderly and 100 mg/day for adults. Treatment duration is 8 weeks, with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) performed weekly to assess plasma concentrations.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Depression Severity (CDI)
Change in depression severity score from Baseline to Week 8 using the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) for adolescents (12-17 years). The CDI is a 27-item scale. Total scores range from 0 to 54. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (a worse outcome).
Change in Depression Severity (MADRS)
Change in depression severity score from Baseline to Week 8 using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) for adults. The MADRS is a 10-item questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity (a worse outcome).
Secondary outcomes
Therapeutic Drug Concentration (PK)
Plasma concentration of the assigned SSRI (Fluoxetine, Escitalopram, or Sertraline) measured at steady state.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (UKU Scale)
Frequency and severity of adverse events assessed using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale. Each assessed item on the scale is scored from 0 (no side effect) to 3 (severe side effect). Higher scores indicate more severe and frequent side effects (a worse outcome).
Changes in Molecular and Biochemical Biomarker Levels
Assessment of changes in serum and plasma concentrations of neuroplasticity markers (BDNF, GDNF, GFAP), pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6), and bioenergetic/mitochondrial markers (e.g., lactate, pyruvate, alpha-ketoglutarate, oxaloacetate, succinate, malate). Additionally, changes in cellular aging and epigenetic markers, including telomere length and selected miRNA variants, will be evaluated to correlate biological profiles with clinical treatment response and pharmacokinetics.
Change in Global Illness Severity and Improvement (CGI)
Assessment of overall illness severity and global improvement throughout the treatment period using the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales. The CGI-S ranges from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The CGI-I ranges from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). For both subscales, higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.