Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional Resistance Training in Older Cancer Survivors: The ACES Trial

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorOHSU Knight Cancer Institute

About this trial

The study will assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of live, online supervised group functional resistance training in older cancer survivors who may have difficulty with independent functioning. The study design is a three-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial (immediate resistance training, delayed resistance training, stretching placebo) in 150 older cancer survivors. The resistance training program will be compared to two different types of common control groups: a stretching placebo group and a delayed intervention group. By using two control conditions, this study can also inform the design of future randomized trials on the selection of an appropriate control group.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 65 years of age or older

Diagnosed with stage I-IV cancer =< 5 years ago

Completed surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy > 3 months ago (concurrent maintenance therapy, such as hormone therapy for breast or prostate cancer, is permissible)

Self-report at least one limitation in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) OR at clinical risk of developing ADL impairment as evidenced by a 3-meter timed-up-and-go time > 13.5 seconds or 5-time chair stand time > 12 seconds

Disqualifiers

Contraindication to moderate intensity exercise

Health or medical condition that affects movement or neurological disorder, or medication that contraindicates participation in live remote resistance exercise

Cognitive impairment consistent with moderate dementia (confirmed by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score < 14). Cognitive impairment consistent with early-stage dementia (a MoCA score of <20) unless a research partner (e.g., family member, caregiver, close friend) can also be consented and can assist in answering the survey questions, participating in the performance tests, or giving informed consent.

Not fluent in English and therefore incapable of answering survey questions, following directions during exercise or performance testing, and providing informed consent in English

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Functional Resistance Training

    Other intervention

    Participants attend live, online supervised group functional resistance training sessions of low-to-moderate intensity exercises, three times per week, 45 minutes per session for 16 weeks.

  • Stretching

    Other intervention

    Participants attend live, online supervised group stretching and relaxation training sessions three times per week, 45 minutes per session for 16 weeks.

  • Delayed Functional Resistance Training

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive educational information about healthy lifestyle behaviors and receive monthly check in calls from study staff. After 16 weeks, participants attend live, online supervised group functional resistance training sessions of low-to-moderate intensity exercises, three times per week, 45 minutes per session for 16 weeks.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (IMMEDIATE functional resistance training program)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Arm II (IMMEDIATE stretching program)Placebo comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Arm III (DELAYED functional resistance training program)Other 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Loss-to-Follow Up

Measured by the percentage of enrolled participants not completing baseline and 16-week survey or performance testing.

Time frame
16 weeks
2

Permanent Discontinuation

Measured by the percentage of enrolled sample that the participant and/or the investigator withdraws before final study visit.

Time frame
16 weeks
3

Attendance

Measured by the percentage of prescribed online sessions attended over the intervention period

Time frame
16 weeks
4

Treatment Interruption

Measured by number of times 3+ consecutive sessions are missed over the 16 week intervention period

Time frame
16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Timed Up and Go (TUG) test

Physical assessment of mobility by evaluating the time that it takes a person to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, and return and sit in the chair. Faster times indicate better mobility

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks
2

Physical Performance Battery (PPB) test

Physical assessment of three timed tests (five repeated chair stands, standing balance, and usual pace gait speed over 4 meters), scored on a scale of 0 (unable) to 4 (completes without difficulty), based on quartiles of performance, then scores are summed, where higher scores indicate better physical functioning.

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks
3

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) FACIT-Fatigue Short Form 13a

Self-report on 13 questions about fatigue in the past seven days, on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), where higher total scores indicate more fatigue.

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks
4

PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8a

Self-report on 8 questions about symptoms of sleep disturbance in the past seven days, on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), where higher total scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks

Other outcomes

1

Frailty

Self-report and physical testing (five individual assessments) that each represent a component of the Frailty Phenotype. Each assessment either does or does not meet the threshold for frailty (Yes = 1, No = 0) and these are summed to determine the total frailty score (\> 3 = frail, 1-2 = pre-frail, 0 = robust). Below is each component, the assessment used, and the threshold that determines the presence of frailty: 1. Weakness (Chair Stand Test, described above in the PPB); \>12 seconds. 2. Slowness (4-Meter Walk Test, described above in the PPB); walking four meters at \< 1 meter/second. 3. Low Activity (self-reported CHAMPS, described below); \< 270 kcal/week (female) and \< 383 kcal/week (male). 4. Exhaustion (self-reported fatigue, details described below in the SF-36 Vitality Scale); scores \< 40 (normed). 5. Shrinking (self-reported unintentional weight loss, measured in pounds); \>10 pounds lost unintentionally over the prior year.

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks
2

Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS)

Self-report on 41 questions about frequency of physical activity over the past four weeks, scored by calculating the frequency (times per week) and estimated caloric expenditure (kcal/week), where higher scores indicate more physical activity.

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks
3

Short Form (SF)-36 Vitality Scale

Self-report on four questions about energy levels and fatigue over the past four weeks, on a scale from 1 (all of the time) to 5 (none of the time), total score is normed (0-100), where higher scores indicate less fatigue (i.e., greater vitality).

Time frame
Baseline, 16 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Oregon Health and Science University

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: