Physical Exam, Static & Dynamic Ultrasound Assessment, & Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fascia (TLF) Mediated Low Back Pain

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-50
SponsorEdward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

About this trial

This Study is for our continued study of the Thoracolumbar Fascia (TFL) in patients with and without low back pain by our experienced multidisciplinary team:

Vincent Wang PhD, VT Biomedical Engineering \& Mechanics (BEAM). Albert J Kozar DO, FAOASM, R-MSK. P. Gunnar Brolinson, DO, FAOASM, FAOCFP. David T. Redden PhD, VCOM Research Biostatistician. Matthew Chung DO, VCOM and Team Physician at Virginia Tech. Edward Magalhaes, PhD, LPC, Psychiatry and Neuro- Behavioral Sciences, VCOM.

This listing is specifically for our renewed efforts via two, Department of Defense (DoD) and American Osteopathic Association (AOA), extramurally, simultaneously funded grants for similar but distinct projects. Both funding sources are aware of each other's funding and have approved their grant study moving forward simultaneously with some integration.

DoD: Machine Learning Analysis of Ultrasound Images for the Investigation of Thoracolumbar Myofascial Pain and Therapeutic Efficacy of Hydrodissection.

The primary objectives of the proposed project are to:

1. develop reliable, quantitative image analysis approaches to objectively distinguish images from subjects with acute or chronic TLF pain from those without pain and 2. to assess the preliminary clinical efficacy of hydrodissection of the TLF as a novel therapeutic treatment for chronic LBP.

AOA: Assessment of the Therapeutic Efficacy of OMT on Chronic Low Back Pain: An Integrated Sonographic and Machine Learning Analysis of Thoracolumbar Fascia Glide Impairment.

The primary objectives of the proposed project are to:

1. assess the preliminary clinical efficacy of OMT as a therapeutic treatment for CLBP of TLF origin and 2. develop reliable, quantitative image analysis approaches to objectively distinguish images from subjects with TLF pain from those without pain.

These projects will share 50 no LBP subjects as controls. The DOD study will include 50 acute LBP and 50 CLBP. The AOA study will include 50 CLBP.

This project uses standard surveys, physical exam, functional tests, and ultrasound imaging to obtain both static images of the TLF at multiple transition zones. It further uses ultrasound to evaluate the dynamic gliding motion, via cine loops, of this fascia in 2 different body movements in subjects with acute low back pain (ALBP), with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and without low back pain (WLBP). All images will be clinically analyzed and further assessed by textural and machine learning analysis. Patients with CLBP (only) will choose to enter one of the two studies (DoD vs AOA) at the time of consent.

All images will be clinically analyzed and further assessed by textural and machine learning analysis. Patients with CLBP (only) that are found to have TLF glide impairment or positive physical exam maneuvers suggesting TLF as etiology will enter the treatment arm of the chosen study at the time of consent, either ultrasound guided hydrodissection (USGH), or Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy (OMT). After receiving 3 treatments utilizing one of these modalities, the CLBP participants will have repeat standard surveys, physical exam, functional tests, and ultrasound imaging assessments at 2,4,6,12, and 24 weeks post-treatment.

At the conclusion of this project, the investigators expect to have developed, refined, and implemented robust and feasible experimental and computational approaches which can be further expanded in larger-scale studies. The development of our data-driven computer models for the objective analysis of sonographic images of the TLF has high potential impact as it seeks to transform the assessment of TLF integrity, injury and healing via establishment of reliable US imaging biomarkers. The investigators anticipate that the tools developed will have broad utility to assess a variety of clinical treatments for the TLF. The investigators also hope to validate physical exam maneuvers that may predict TLF mediated LBP and have preliminary evidence of the efficacy of hydrodissection and OMT in TLF mediated LBP.

In pursuit of these objectives, the investigators will adopt an innovative approach featuring a robust integration of clinical imaging, physical exam, pain and functional outcomes, quantitative image analysis, and machine learning analyses.

Specific Aim 1: Compare sonographic TLF imaging characteristics in individuals with acute versus chronic pain to those without low back pain.

Specific Aim 2: Develop a machine learning (ML) classification algorithm to reliably distinguish abnormal myofascial tissue in acute versus chronic pain stages from healthy tissue.

Specific Aim 3:

DoD Study: Assess the preliminary therapeutic efficacy of hydrodissection as a novel treatment for TLF pain using quantitative US imaging and ML tools.

AOA Study: Assess the preliminary therapeutic efficacy of OMT as a treatment for CLBP using quantitative US imaging and ML tools.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

ALL 18-50 year olds with No Low Back Pain (LBP); Acute LBP (< 3 months); or Chronic LBP (> 3 months)

Disqualifiers

Allergy to ultrasound gel - relative, consider alternatives

BMI: > 30

Pregnancy or Breastfeeding: current or remote, within the past 6 months

Spinal Surgery: history of lower thoracic or lumbar spine: within the past year, of more than a single level of hardware. (prior single level microdiscectomy, laminectomy, or fusion, that is stable for 1 year or greater is NOT excluded)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ultrsound Guided Hydrodissection of the Thoracolumbar Fascia

    Procedure/Surgery

    The injection of a fluid solution to separate facial or tissue layers in the body. Usually guided by ultrasound.

  • Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)

    Procedure/Surgery

    The therapeutic application of manually guided forces by an osteopathic physician (US Usage) to improve physiologic function and/or support homeostasis that has been altered by somatic dysfunction. OMT employs a variety of techniques.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Ultrasound Guided Hydrodissection of TLF Glide ImpairmentExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Passive and Active motion induced TLF glide motion

Glide motion will be measured in mm. As Pilot Study, the lower 33rd percentile of motion will be considered glide impairment. Dynamic cine loops are obtained with 1. Five cycles of 20 degree prone trunk flexion (PTF) induced by a motorized table were recorded, with probe centered vertically over L3-L4 paraspinal muscles. 2. Five cycles of 12" prone active straight leg raise (pASLR), contralateral \& ipsilateral, were recorded with probe centered vertically over T12-L1 paraspinal muscles. Active glide has never been studied. the investigators will be looking at multiple properties of glide motion. In regards to AIM 3 treatment arms, after all 3 treatments of either hydrodisection or OMT, are completed: 1. Short term improvement will be assessed compared to baseline at 6 weeks. 2. Long Term improvement will be assessed compared to baseline at 24 weeks.

Time frame
After AIM 3 treatment arms, after all 3 treatments of either hydrodisection or OMT, are completed: 1) Short term improvement will be assessed compared to baseline at 6 weeks. 2) Long Term improvement will be assessed compared to baseline at 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Physical Exam Maneuvers to Predict TLF involvement in Subjects with CLBP.

All subjects will have physical exam (PE) sequences. Along with several standard LB maneuvers, the investigators will specifically assess 1) Prone Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLRp) with and without a followup test of applied pre-stress tensioning (medially directed superficial tension) through the posterior layer of the TLF at T12-L1 on the contralateral and then ipsalateral side of the leg that causes pain. Relief of pain caused with pASLR from either sided pre-stress is considered positive test suggesting TLF as a component of the LBP related to glide impairment. 2) Prone Hip Extension Strength and Hip External Rotation Strength with and without an applied prestress to the Lumbar Interfascial Triangle (LIFT) or Lateral Intermuscular Septum of the Thigh (LIST). Return of strength to 5/5 with ipsalateral pre-stress focused at either the LIFT or LIST region is considered positive test suggesting TLF as a component of the LBP, related to TLF dysfunction.

Time frame
Positive tests will be determined at baseline. Resolution of positive tests after CLBP subject treatments will be assessed at 2 week followup scans.
2

SWE measurements in CLBP vs No LBP

SWE measurements in meters/second SWE will be measured at 31 probe locations looking for indicators of biomarkers that may suggest TLF involvement in CLBP.

Time frame
At Baseline.
3

SWE measurements Post Treatments in CLBP Subjects

SWE measurements in meters/second. SWE will be measured at 31 probe locations looking for indicators of biomarkers that may suggest TLF involvement in CLBP. Images will be obtained at baseline and 2,4,6,12, and 24 weeks post treatment arms.

Time frame
After AIM 3 treatment arms, after all 3 treatments of either hydrodisection or OMT, are completed: 1) Short term improvement will be assessed compared to baseline at 6 weeks. 2) Long Term improvement will be assessed compared to baseline at 24 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

Lead sponsor

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Collaborator