Pilot of Food Is Medicine Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Children With Food Insecurity and Diabetes

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age5-12
SponsorKatelyn Fox

About this trial

Study Design: This two-arm parallel trial will randomize 12 families to receive 6-weeks of medically tailored meals or produce prescriptions. Both groups will receive nutrition coaching, weekly during the intervention. The hypothesis is that both interventions to have a positive impact on food security and fruit and vegetable intake. However, medically tailored meals also reduce the logistic barriers of planning, preparing, and calculating the carbohydrate content of nutritionally balanced meals essential for DM management. Therefore, the medically tailored meal intervention will result in greater improvements in the co-primary outcomes of diet quality and glucose stability after the intervention.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Families of school-age children (ages 5-12 years) with T1DM and food insecurity

fluent in English or Spanish.

child uses a continuous glucose monitor (CGM)

willing to provide consent for the research team to access CGM data

Disqualifiers

recent diagnosis of T1DM (<6 months)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Produce prescription

    Behavioral

    Produce prescriptions: Weekly boxes of fresh produce. Similar to the USDA's TEFAP (The Emergency Food Assistance Program), boxes include 10-12 lbs of fresh fruits and vegetables per month (adjustable based on family size).

  • Medically tailored meal kits

    Behavioral

    Medically Tailored Meals: Families will receive 3 semi-prepared medically tailored meal kits and recipes per week x 6 weeks.

  • Nutrition Coaching

    Behavioral

    Nutrition Coaching: Nutrition coaches will provide families with weekly phone check-ins using brief motivational interviewing and applied problem solving. During the first half of the intervention (weeks 1-3), coaches will assess barriers to preparing and consuming the prescribed foods (meal kits or produce), with the goal of improving diet quality. The second half of the intervention (weeks 4-6) will focus on building self-efficacy, skills, and resources required to plan and prepare meals on a budget and strategies to increase fruit and vegetable intake.

Treatment groups

12 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Medically tailored meal kits + nutrition coachingExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Produce prescription + nutrition coachingActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Feasibility

Feasibility will be assessed using the following criteria: Recruitment of \>50% of families screened eligible, retention of \> 65% of randomized families at follow-up, \>50% adherence to coaching protocol, and \>50% preparation of the prescribed meals.

Time frame
baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
2

Acceptability

Acceptability will be assessed using the following criteria: caregiver report of target child consuming prepared foods more than half of the time, and a net promotor score \>20.

Time frame
immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Diet quality

The 24-hour dietary recalls will be collected by masked assessors using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR), a computer-based software application that facilitates the collection of recalls in a standardized fashion, using a multiple-pass interview approach to improve participant recall.51 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2020) will be calculated using the NCI per person algorithm.HEI-2020 is scored on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better diet quality.

Time frame
baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
2

Change in Glucose Stability

Glucose stability will be assessed using time in range (TIR), using CGM data. We will calculate TIR as the percent of time an individual spends in a target BG range (% of readings with-in 70-180 mg/dL). TIR is a strong indicator of DM management and future CVD risk.

Time frame
baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
3

Change in Food Security

United States Department of Agriculture Food Security Survey Module (USDA FSSM) 18-Item. This survey is score on a scale of 0-18 with higher scores indicating higher food insecurity. Categorically For households with one or more children a Raw score zero= High food security, Raw score 1-2=Marginal food security, Raw score 3-7=Low food security, Raw score 8-18=Very low food security

Time frame
baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention

Other outcomes

1

Engagement

Redemption rate and adherence rate.

Time frame
through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
2

Percent adherence to the study protocol

adherence to the nutrition coaching protocol

Time frame
through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
3

Cost

cost per participant

Time frame
through study completion, an average of 6 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Katelyn Fox

Lead sponsor

The Miriam Hospital

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: