Pilot Study of Performance Status 2 vs. Performance Status 0-1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Chemo/Immunotherapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorWake Forest University Health Sciences

About this trial

This pilot study is configured as a non-inferiority comparison of Performance Status 2 patients with Performance Status 0-1 patients, with the goal of demonstrating non-inferiority in terms of efficacy (progression-free survival, overall survival) and safety (rates of adverse events, quality of life) when treating Performance Status 2 patients with the same first-line immunotherapy-based regimen as Performance Status 0-1 patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients must have a cytological or histological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer that is metastatic or unresectable for which standard curative measures do not exist.

No prior systemic treatment with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy for non-curative intent. Patients may have previously received cancer treatment with curative intent for prior early-stage disease.

At least 18 years old.

ECOG performance status of 0-2, as determined by the treating physician in the consult note.

Disqualifiers

Nonsmall cell lung cancer that is known at registration to be positive for a tumor activating alteration for which first line targeted therapy is indicated; specifically, a targetable mutation in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), gene rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), gene rearrangement of c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), or mutation in B isoform of rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (B-Raf). For non-squamous subtypes, molecular testing of tumor and peripheral blood should be attempted for actionable biomarkers, but if there is an insufficient quantity of tumor material for testing and it is not feasible to attempt additional biopsies before starting systemic therapy, then these biomarker results are not necessary for inclusion on the study. For squamous subtype, molecular testing should be considered but is not necessary for inclusion on the study.

Known to have an active autoimmune disease that required systemic treatment in the past 2 years (i.e., with use of disease modifying agents, systemic corticosteroids, or immunosuppressive drugs).

History of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required systemic corticosteroids.

Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pembrolizumab

    Drug

    ALL PARTICIPANTS: Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Atezolizumab

    Drug

    ALL PARTICIPANTS: 1,200 mg IV on day 1 over 60 minutes of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles. If the first infusion is tolerated, then all subsequent infusions (cycles 2-4) may be delivered over 30 minutes. The subcutaneous formulation of atezolizumab may be substituted for the intravenous formulation as follows: Atezolizumab hyaluronidase-tqjs 15 mL (1,875 mg atezolizumab and 30,000 units hyaluronidase) subcutaneously into the thigh over 7 minutes on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Cemiplimab-Rwlc

    Drug

    ALL PARTICIPANTS: 350 mg IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Carboplatin

    Drug

    FOR PARTICIPANTS IN EITHER ARM with non-squamous or squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 ≥50%, and the treating clinician has opted for combination chemo/immunotherapy OR non-squamous or squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 1-49% or unknown: Carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 IV on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles. AUC dosing (5-6) will be selected by the treating provider.

  • Paclitaxel

    Drug

    FOR PARTICIPANTS IN EITHER ARM with squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 ≥50%, and the treating clinician has opted for combination chemo/immunotherapy OR squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 1-49% or unknown: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Nab paclitaxel

    Drug

    FOR PARTICIPANTS IN EITHER ARM with squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 ≥50%, and the treating clinician has opted for combination chemo/immunotherapy OR squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 1-49% or unknown: Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 of 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Pemetrexed

    Drug

    FOR PARTICIPANTS IN EITHER ARM with non-squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 ≥50%, and the treating clinician has opted for combination chemo/immunotherapy OR non-squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 1-49% or unknown: Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Cisplatin

    Drug

    FOR PARTICIPANTS IN EITHER ARM with non-squamous or squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 ≥50%, and the treating clinician has opted for combination chemo/immunotherapy OR non-squamous or squamous subtype, predictive biomarker PD-L1 1-49% or unknown: Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles.

  • Quality of Life Questionnaire, lung cancer-specific (QLQ-LC13)

    Other intervention

    The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items.

  • QLQ-C30 Global Health/Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Other intervention

    30 item questionnaire - Functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), global health status and quality of life scale, also several single-item symptom measures.

  • COPD Assessment Test and modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Patient Reported Outcomes

    Other intervention

    Dyspnea scale scores in patients with respiratory disease (particularly COPD) to establish baseline functional dyspnea burden (taken pre-study at Week 0 and Post Treatment at week 13).

  • PROMIS and FACT-G Questionnaires

    Other intervention

    PROMIS 4-item short forms: Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Anxiety, and Depression as well as 1 item from the FACT-G which has been established as a valid indicator of treatment side effect bother ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment"); 17 symptom burden questions in total.

  • Sleep Disorder Assessments (ISI, Berlin Sleep Questionnaire)

    Other intervention

    7 items on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and 10 items from the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire, a risk assessment for obstructive sleep apnea.

Treatment groups

105 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Performance Status 0-1 ParticipantsExperimental treatment 13 interventions
Group B: Performance Status 2 ParticipantsExperimental treatment 13 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of Participants with Progression-Free Survival

Using non-blinded central imaging using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 to define progressive disease. RECIST v 1.1 criteria: * Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. * Partial Response (PR): Decrease by ≥ 30% in sum of longest diameter of target lesions. * Stable Disease (SD): Not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or PD. * Progressive Disease (PD): Increase by ≥ 20% in sum of longest diameter of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants that did not have radiographically measurable metastatic disease by RECIST criteria before starting treatment, progression is defined as the development of new lesions or by unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame
From baseline to end of 4th cycle of treatment (12 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

1

Incidences of Grade 3 to Grade 5 Treatment-Related Adverse Events

Adverse events will be defined using CTCAE Version 5.0 after four cycles (12 weeks).

Time frame
12 weeks
2

Change in Overall Quality of Life/Global Health Status - EORTC QLQ-C30

Using the total score of the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a 30-item questionnaire for functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), global health status and quality of life scale, also several single-item symptom measures. Scoring scale : 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Minimum score 0, maximum score 100. For functional and global quality of life scales, higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.

Time frame
From baseline to end of 4th cycle of treatment (12 weeks)
3

Proportion of Participants with Deterioration in Symptoms - QLQ-LC13

Patient reported deterioration in three symptoms: Cough, chest pain, or dyspnea as measured by the symptoms scales as part of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13). Deterioration is defined as a 10-point or greater decrease from baseline in either cough, chest pain, or dyspnea and subsequently confirmed by a second adjacent 10-point or greater decrease from baseline in the same symptom)

Time frame
From baseline to end of 4th cycle of treatment (12 weeks)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator