Pilot Study on the Validity of the Metacognitive Hub Model of Craving in Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorders (BED)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age18-65
SponsorLaval University

About this trial

Craving is defined as an irrepressible urge to consume certain products and represents one of the key factors in severe substance use disorders, as illustrated by its recent inclusion as a diagnostic criterion in the most recent fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5). However, the pathophysiological models of craving remain debated.

The "metacognitive hub model", a conceptual, experimental and clinical approach to craving, proposes that craving should be considered as the embedded consequence of the interaction between three components (the reflexive, automatic and interoceptive systems), each of which has an implicit and explicit element. This model links the three components by suggesting that metacognitive abilities, the ability to understand one's own cognitive functioning, may be a skill of individuals that allows them to make the three sub-components explicit or not.

To date, the conception of eating disorders is increasingly similar to that of addictive disorders. Indeed, there is growing evidence that the symptomatology of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder can be considered in part as an "food addiction" and would fit the diagnostic criteria of an addictive disorder. Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder (DSM 5) characterized by a cycle of binge eating and compensatory behaviors such as self-induced vomiting that tend to negate or compensate for the effects of the binge eating. Binge eating disorder (DSM 5) is characterized by a cycle of binge eating, but without the compensatory behaviors seen in bulimia nervosa. In addition, there are common neurological aspects as well as similar cognitions between these eating disorders and addictive disorders. Given the importance of craving in addictive pathology, it seems essential to address this issue in bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. The cognitive difficulties of patients with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder, which are close to the difficulties observed in patients with addictive behaviors, suggest that the "metacognitive hub model" could provide a clear and measurable theoretical framework of the different dimensions of craving.

The overall objective of this project is to explore the relationship between the level of craving induced by food picture exposure and the level of impairment of the reflexive, automatic, interoceptive, and metacognitive systems in women with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder and to compare these impairments according to the nature of the eating disorder (i.e., binge eating versus bulimia nervosa).

Our hypotheses are:

1. the induction of food craving will affect the reflexive, automatic, and interoceptive systems of patients with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. 2. the magnitude of the effect of food craving induction on implicit craving and explicit craving will be modulated by the participants' metacognitive abilities.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

have been medically diagnosed with binge eating disorder or bulimia nervosa

fluent in french

able to consent

Disqualifiers

co-morbid substance use disorder,

pregnancy or breastfeeding

Trial population

Participants consulted by specialized psychiatrist at IUCPQ Participants who have already participated in a research project and have agreed to be contacted for other projects Participants recruited via the ANEB and Maison l'Éclaircie mailing lists and via an ad on social networks. Participants receiving care at the CEPIA or on the CEPIA waiting list.

Trial design

Design model

Case-only

Time perspective

Cross-sectional

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Food craving induction

    Behavioral

    Standardized craving induction procedure will be used, based on exposure to food-related images (https://www.lippc2s.fr/food-cal-pictures/). Craving intensity will be measured by visual analogic scale before and after the induction sequence.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Binge Eating Disorder1 intervention
Group B: Bulimia Nervosa1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Attention Network Test (ANT)

The ANT is a task designed to test three attentional networks in children and adults: alerting, orienting, and executive control

Time frame
1 hour (after food craving induction)
2

Dot Probe Task

To test and measure selective attention

Time frame
1 hour (after food craving induction)
3

Water load task

This task was originally developed to induce gastric distension and assess gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with functional digestive disorders. This task stimulates the stomach using a natural distension stimulus (i.e., water ingestion) and without the complex hormonal response of a caloric meal.

Time frame
1 hour (after food craving induction)
4

Live metacognition

"live" metacognitive assessment will be done by asking the participants to rate their level of confidence on a visual analog scale ranging from 0% (I just guessed) to 100% (completely confident) for each items.

Time frame
1 hour (after food craving induction)

Secondary outcomes

1

Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

Minimum score : 0; Maximun score : 63; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline
2

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

The questionnaire includes two scales (20 items) consisting of a total of 40 questions. For each scale the minimum score is 0 and the maximun score is 80. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline
3

Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)

The measure provides four attitudinal subscale scores: Restraint (5 items), Eating Concern (5 items), Shape Concern (8 items), and Weight Concern (5 items). An overall Global score is the mean of the four subscale scores. Responses are on a 7-point ordinal response; minimum score : 0, maximun score: 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline
4

Food Craving Questionnaire State (FCQ-S)

Minimum : 15; Maximun : 75; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline

Other outcomes

1

Age

Time frame
Baseline
2

Gender

Time frame
Baseline
3

Biological sex

Time frame
Baseline
4

Weight

Time frame
Baseline

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Laval University

Lead sponsor

Université de Nantes

Collaborator

Centre d'expertise Poids, Image et Alimentation (CEPIA)

Collaborator

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec

Collaborator