About this trial
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune and prothrombotic disorder that can affect up to 10% of young people experiencing a thrombotic event. Its treatment relies on long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Direct oral anticoagulants, which are simpler to use because they do not require regular blood monitoring, are contraindicated because they are associated with an increased risk of thrombotic recurrence in some patients with APS.
Patients with APS receive VKAs and must regularly have their Index Normalized Ratio (INR) measured via a cumbersome venous blood draw. Capillary INR measurement systems are already used in certain situations, such as in patients with mechanical heart valves. The use of these systems improves the quality of life of these patients and, above all, the stability of VKA therapy, thus preventing potentially serious hemorrhagic complications or thrombotic recurrences.
In antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), these systems are discouraged due to perceived differences between capillary and venous INR (the reference method). However, among the few studies on the subject, none demonstrated significant discrepancies between patients with APS and controls, and when such discrepancies were observed, the origin of this variability could not be determined. We hypothesize that the biological profile of antiphospholipid antibodies is responsible for the INR differences.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients with APS treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)
Patients with an LA profile without aCL or anti-β2GPI (isolated LA)
Patients with an LA and aCL + anti-β2GPI profile (triple positivity)
Patients with another biological profile (other than isolated LA or triple positivity)
Disqualifiers
Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) not treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)
Women of childbearing age without effective contraception
Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding women
Unemancipated minors
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Coaguchek
DevicePoint of care testing INR using Coaguchek device
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Discrepancy between Coaguchek and venous INR
Percentage of patients per group with a fixed 20% discrepancy between a capillary INR measured on a Coagucheck© device and a venous INR according to subgroups and variables
Secondary outcomes
Discrepancy between MicroLine and venous INR
Percentage of patients per group with a fixed 20% discrepancy between a capillary INR measured on a MicroLine INR© device and a venous INR according to subgroups and variables
Discrepancy between Coaguchek and MicroLine INR
Percentage of patients per group with a fixed 20% discrepancy between a capillary INR measured on a Coagucheck© and MicroLine devices according to subgroups and variables
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: