Potential of Interface Care Models to Deliver More Appropriate Care to Patients With Acute Medical Illness

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age21+
SponsorNational University Hospital, Singapore

About this trial

Every country in the world is experiencing growth in both the size and the proportion of older persons. As a result of the changes, the profile and needs of people with medical illnesses have evolved. How care is delivered to patients has to keep pace with these changes, or patients will experience poor care at high cost and not have their needs met. A new model of care has emerged to meet these challenges: Acute Medical Unit. Despite considerable investment and popularity of this model, questions remain: (i) Who benefits most from this care model? (ii) How may these models be most effectively implemented for the best results? (iii) How effective are these models? Singapore is well-placed to answer these questions with its national healthcare system and excellent research institutions. The investigators plan to study how effective the model is by comparing patients with similar profiles exposed to both these care models compared to how hospital care is usually provided, looking for four differences: (i) how long patients stay in hospital, (ii) how often they use the emergency department (iii) quality of health (iv) cost. Additionally, the investigators seek to characterise patterns of health needs for this group of patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

AMU inclusion criteria - admission from ED to AMU directly

Control group inclusion criteria - admission from ED to GW directly

Acute medical illnesses that includes infection-related conditions, falls-disequilibrium, and acute exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Disqualifiers

Below 21 years old

Patients undergoing active chemotherapy

Patients with active pregnancy

Patients admitted less than 24 hours

Trial population

The study population will consist of adult patients admitted to the National University Hospital (NUH), Singapore, for acute medical conditions. Participants will be recruited either from the Acute Medical Unit (AMU) or directly to the General Ward (GW) following presentation to the Emergency Department. Patients represent a typical mix of acute medical admissions seen in a tertiary hospital setting, including infection-related illnesses, falls with disequilibrium, and acute exacerbations of chronic diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

220 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups
Group A: Acute Medical Unit (AMU) Patients
Group B: General Ward (GW) Control Patients

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Mean acute care bed-days utilised

Average total days of acute hospital stay, including the index episode, for each patient. Measures efficiency of hospital care between AMU and GW groups.

Time frame
Up to 6 months following discharge

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient Outcomes - Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)

Patients rate 5 areas - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression on a 5-level scale from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). Scores are combined into an overall health index, where higher scores indicate worse health status. This captures the patient's overall quality of life over the follow-up period.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0, at discharge), 3 months post-discharge, and 6 months post-discharge
2

Patient Outcomes - Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13)

Patients answer 13 questions on a 4-point scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree," with a "not applicable" option. Raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate greater engagement in self-care. Scores classify patients into four levels: Level 1 = disengaged, Level 2 = gaining confidence, Level 3 = taking action, Level 4 = confident and maintaining self-management.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0, at discharge) and 6 months post-discharge
3

Patient Outcomes - World Health Organisation Five Wellbeing (WHO-5)

Patient answers five questions that assess mood, energy, and interest in daily life over the past two weeks, scored 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time). The total score (0-25) is multiplied by 4 to create a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better wellbeing.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0, at discharge), 3 months post-discharge, and 6 months post-discharge
4

Patient Outcomes - Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

PHQ-9 includes 9 items scored 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), total 0-27; higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0, at discharge) and 6 months post-discharge

Other outcomes

1

Cost-effectiveness

Estimate the change to 'total costs' and the change to 'health benefits' as measured by Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYS) from a decision to adopt AMU as compared to the 'existing acute care chain' in Singapore

Time frame
Up to 6 months from discharge

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

National University Hospital, Singapore

Lead sponsor

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Collaborator