Pragmatic Evaluation of Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age50+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

About this trial

Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. An anchoring device can reduce dissection and operative time and is meant to provide strong fixation whilst minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages must be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This cohort study will be on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Women with pelvic organ prolapse with leading edge at or beyond the hymen as confirmed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), i.e. Ba ≥ -1 cm for the anterior compartment, and/or Bp ≥ -1 cm for the posterior compartment, and/or C ≥ -1 cm for the apical compartment including recurrence.

Women due for POP surgery using the Anchorsure System® for apical prolapse suspension with or without concomitant native tissue repair, with or without concomitant hysterectomy and with or without concomitant sling for stress urinary incontinence.

All women who have not indicated any objection to participating in the study.

All women who have been correctly informed.

Disqualifiers

Patient taking part or having taken part in a device or drug interventional study within the last three months (except for VIGI-MESH national registry).

Patients due for pelvic organ prolapse repair without apical suspension or with anything other than native tissue repair and the Anchorsure System®.

Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Patients with active non-controlled or chronic gynaecologic or urinary tract infection and/or local tissue necrosis.

Trial population

The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment of The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse using Anchorsure System® in the participating centres: Nîmes University Hospital, Lille University Hospital, Sainte-Anne Clinic in Strasbourg, La Rochelle Hospital and Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • The Anchorsure System®

    Device

    Sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®.

YES /NO

Time frame
12 months after fixation

Secondary outcomes

1

Device or procedure-related adverse events: Daily Pain score

All procedure-related adverse events and complications will be recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system with a one-month pain diary (filled in once a day using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 for buttock pain;

Time frame
Day 0 to Day 30
2

Device or procedure-related adverse events: Anchor palpability

The anchor palpability score will be recorded regularly for up to 36 months after surgery.

Time frame
36 months after surgery
3

Device or procedure-related adverse events: Abnormal findings on clinical examination

All abnormal findings on clinical examination will be reported including suture exposure, anchor extrusion into another organ, perforation, organ or vascular or nerve injury/damage, fistula, bleeding including hematoma (requiring transfusion or not), thrombotic event, neuromuscular problems (including pain), pelvic discomfort or pain, de novo dyspareunia, infection (e.g. vaginal, urinary tract infection), urinary tract complications including ureteric disorders, urinary retention requiring drainage \> 48h, urge symptoms or incontinence (worsening or de novo), de novo constipation or faecal incontinence. Incidences of adverse events will be determined overall, by type of adverse event, severity, compartment and type of sacrospinous suspension (uni versus bilateral and anterior versus posterior).

Time frame
36 months after surgery
4

Type of sacrospinous fixation technique used

The type of sacrospinous fixation technique used: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior will be recorded

Time frame
Day 0

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille

Collaborator

Kremlin-Bicetre Hospital, Paris

Collaborator

Clinique Sainte-Anne, Strasbourg

Collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle

Collaborator