PRAISE-IR Versus CIBMTR Controls

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age1-66
SponsorMiltenyi Biomedicine GmbH

About this trial

The rationale to conduct this RWE study is to provide data to support the safety of CD34 selected grafts versus T replete PBSC transplants to address concerns about increased TRM in CD34 selected graft recipients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients who participated in the PRAISE-IR single center phase II study

Patient age at transplant: ≥ 1 year and < 66 years

HLA 8/8 MRD or MUD

Conditioning intensity: myeloablative

Disqualifiers

HLA <8/8 MRD or MUD Arm B: Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (CIBMTR population)

Patients who participated in the PRAISE-IR study

Patients who did not sign consent for research

Patient transplanted at a center that does not meet CIBMTR data quality standards

Trial population

Disease: Patients with AML, MDS, and ALL

Trial design

Design model

Other

Time perspective

Retrospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

51 Participants
are grouped into 4 trial groups
Group A: Arm A: Model-based ATG dosing CD34-selection (PRAISE-IR population)
Group B: Arm B: Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (CIBMTR population)
Group C: Arm B*:Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (BMT CTN 1301 population)
Group D: Arm C: Control CIBMTR population

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Comparison of OS between PRAISE-IR study participants (Arm A) with CIBMTR control participants who have received a CD34 selected graft and standard dose ATG (Arm B) with the goal of demonstrating superiority of Arm A.

Comparison of overall survival (OS) between PRAISE-IR study participants (Arm A) with CIBMTR control participants who have received a CD34 selected graft and standard dose ATG (Arm B). Note: If the number of participants meeting the criteria for Arm B is insufficient for 1:1 matching, Arm A could be compared with the CD34 selection group from the BMT CTN1301 study (Arm B\*). Comparison of OS between PRAISE-IR study participants (Arm A) with CIBMTR control patients who have received standard of care (SoC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) without CD34 selection with post transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)/Methotrexate (MTX) for GVHD prophylaxis (Arm C).

Time frame
two years

Secondary outcomes

1

Acute GVHD, grades II-IV

Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD), grades II-IV

Time frame
two years
2

Chronic GVHD

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

Time frame
two years
3

Hematologic recovery (time to neutrophil engraftment and time to platelet engraftment)

Hematologic recovery (time to neutrophil engraftment and time to platelet engraftment)

Time frame
two years
4

Rate of primary graft failure

Rate of primary graft failure

Time frame
two years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: