PredIcting sterOid depeNdEnt livEr injuRy With Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorHannover Medical School

About this trial

The investigators identified polyreactive immunoglobulin G (pIgG) in adults (published in Hepatology: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32134) and children (in preparation). Quantification of these pIgG using a "home-made" ELISA facilitates the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as compared to non-AIH liver diseases and healthy controls. Positivity for pIgG was independent from ANA/SMA positivity and equally diagnostic for AIH even when conventional autoantibodies (ANA/SMA/SLA/LKM) were negative.

Additionally, the frequency of pIgG was lower than conventional autoantibodies (ANA, SMA) in vaccinia/drug associated severe liver injury in a retrospective multicenter study after Covid-19 vaccination (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100605).

Aims of the study The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of pIgG to predict AIH in comparison to other liver diseases prospectively. To avoid diagnostic inaccuracy between AIH with long-term need for an immunosuppression and drug induced liver injury with autoimmune features, which can be indistinguishable from AIH at baseline and which has a very low relapse rate after a short steroid course, a follow-up after six months is obligatory for inclusion.

Therefore, the investigators will collect one serum sample from every patient (without immunosuppressive treatment) that presents to the respective hospital for evaluation of liver disease by liver biopsy within one year after initiation of the study and that provided written informed consent. Follow-up for evaluation of steroid dependency at six months after diagnosis is obligatory.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnostic liver biopsy for the work-up of any liver disease

Informed consent

Definition of any liver disease according to current societal guidelines

Disqualifiers

Ongoing immunosuppression at the liver biopsy or prior to the liver biopsy

Liver biopsies for the grading or staging of an already known liver disease (e.g. non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), Hepatitis B/D Virus Infections (HBV/HDV Infection), …)

known liver disease

missing informed consent

Trial population

Any patient that presents to the respective hospital for evaluation of a so far unknown-liver disease and consents is eligible if the treating physician orders a liver biopsy for the diagnostic evaluation of the liver disease. Patients are not eligible if a liver biopsy is performed for staging or grading of an already known liver disease or if the patient is treated with immunosuppressive drugs at the time of the liver biopsy.

Trial design

Design model

Case-control

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • polyreactive immunoglobulin G

    Diagnostic test

    Polyreactive immunoglobulin G will be tested centralized in Hannover as published (Taubert, Engel et al., Hepatology, 2022). The current standard diagnostic autoantibodies (e.g. ANA, anti-SMA, anti-LKM, anti-LC1, anti-SLA/L) will be tested centrally in Hannover according to current guidelines.

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Autoimmune Hepatitis1 intervention
Group B: non-autoimmune hepatitis liver disease1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Sensitivity of new simplified pIgG AIH Score

Autoimmune serology will be substituted by pIgG in the 2021 simplified AIH Score. Sensitivity of the new score will be compared to the old score, primarily for non-inferiority and second for superiority if non-inferiority was met.

Time frame
Assessment of steroid dependency at six months after enrollment
2

Specificty of pIgG simplified AIH Score

Autoimmune serology will be substituted by pIgG in the 2021 simplified AIH Score. Sensitivity of the new score will be compared to the old score, primarily for non-inferiority and second for superiority if non-inferiority was met.

Time frame
Assessment at baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

Diagnostic discrimination between AIH and DILI by polyreactive IgG

Time frame
At enrollment
2

Prediction of steroid dependent hepatitis by any other autoantibody

Prediction of steroid dependent hepatitis by any other elevated conventional autoantibody according to current guidelines (European Association for the study of the liver: EASL, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: AASLD)

Time frame
Assessment of steroid dependency at six months after enrollment
3

Age-dependency of autoantibodies

Presence of autoantibodies will be descriptively evaluated with regard to age of the patients as currently it is proposed that lower antibody titers/levels are diagnostic in children (dependent on age) than in adults

Time frame
Assessment of autoantibodies at baseline

Other outcomes

1

Concordance of different testing methods for autoantibodies

Different methodology to assess presence of autoantibodies (e.g. ELISA, Immunofluorescence on tissue sections) will be tested head-to-head for their diagnostic capacity

Time frame
At enrollment

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.