Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Revascularization Using Deep Learning

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age30-80
SponsorState Institution "Republican Scientific and Practical Center" Cardiology, Belarus

About this trial

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) was initially described as a clinical complication following carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but it may occur after both CEA and carotid artery stenting. It is characterised by throbbing ipsilateral frontotemporal or periorbital headache, and sometimes diffuse headache, eye and facial pain, vomiting, confusion, macular oedema, visual disturbances, focal motor seizures with frequent secondary generalisation, focal neurological deficits, and intracerebral or subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Knowledge of CHS among physicians remains limited. Most studies report an incidence of 1-3% after carotid endarterectomy. CHS is most common in patients with increases of more than 100% in cerebral perfusion compared with baseline after carotid revascularization, and is rare in patients with perfusion increases of less than 100% compared with baseline.

The pathophysiological mechanism of CHS is only partially understood. The chronic low-flow state induced by severe carotid disease results in compensatory dilation of cerebral vessels distal to the stenosis, as part of the normal autoregulatory response to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF). In this chronically dilated state, the vessels lose their ability to autoregulate vascular resistance in response to changes in blood pressure. Dysautoregulation has been shown to be proportional to the duration and severity of chronic hypoperfusion. After revascularization and reperfusion, impaired cerebral autoregulation may contribute to a cascade of intracranial microcirculatory changes, with an inability to respond adequately to the augmentation of CBF following carotid recanalization.

Although most patients present with mild symptoms and signs, progression to severe and life-threatening complications can occur if CHS is not recognised and treated promptly. Because CHS is diagnosed on the basis of several non-specific signs and symptoms, patients may be misdiagnosed as having one of the better-known causes of perioperative complications, such as thromboembolism.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age between 30 and 80 years.

Occlusive-stenotic lesion of the carotid arteries with indications for carotid revascularization.

Disqualifiers

Systemic vasculitis.

Cerebral vessel aneurysms.

Arteriovenous malformation of the brain.

Primary brain tumor (including metastatic lesions).

Trial population

Patients who will undergo carotid revascularization procedures

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Carotid revascularization

    Procedure/Surgery

    Carotid revascularization

Treatment groups

500 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Patients with Reduced Cerebrovascular Reserve1 intervention
Group B: Patients with Sufficient Cerebrovascular Reserve1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Number of Participants with Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome

The diagnosis of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome will be based on the following criteria: 1. Appearance of symptoms within 1 month after surgery. 2. First-time unilateral headache, convulsions, hemiparesis/hemiplegia, visual disturbances, ataxia, Glasgow Coma Scale score \< 15 points, aphasia, or signs of cerebral edema or intracerebral hemorrhage. 3. Symptoms of "luxury perfusion syndrome" occurring within the first 24-48 hours after restoration of blood flow through the internal carotid artery. 4. Increase in cerebral blood flow in the middle cerebral artery \> 100% compared with the preoperative value, measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. 5. Exclusion of differential diagnoses, including hypertensive encephalopathy, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. 6. Neurological symptoms occurring in the context of high blood pressure.

Time frame
Occurrence of symptoms within 30 postoperative days

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.