Preschool Hearing Screening

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-6
SponsorUniversity of California, San Francisco

About this trial

Children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (D/HH) are at risk of speech and language delays, which can be mitigated through early identification and intervention. Identifying hearing loss (HL) during preschool is crucial, but the most effective hearing screening method for preschoolers remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to learn whether, compared to the gold-standard two-stage Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) + otoacoustic emissions (OAE) screening (TS-PO), single-stage OAE (SS-O) screening alone is not inferior at identifying hearing loss when performed in a community-based preschool setting. This study holds the potential to improve early hearing loss detection and intervention among D/HH children, reducing the likelihood of speech and language delays.

A diverse group of 13,764 preschool-age children across community-based preschool centers will be recruited. The intervention involves all subjects undergoing both PTA and OAE screening, with the order determined through randomization. Children who show potential hearing issues based on screening results or teacher concerns will receive further testing to determine the final hearing outcome. Group allocation will be post-hoc, based on their screening results.

In addition to the primary objective, the study will compare other hearing screening measures and outcomes between the two methods (TS-PO and SS-O). This approach aims to reflect the real-life effectiveness of hearing screening in a diverse population. Ultimately, the study seeks to provide insights into an optimal hearing screening method that could prevent speech and language delays among D/HH children.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 2:0 - 6:0 years

Enrolled in a community-based preschool program

Disqualifiers

Known permanent HL, by parental or school report

Use of a hearing assistive device

Parent does not consent for hearing screening

Child was screened previously for this study

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Otoacoustic Emissions Testing

    Other intervention

    An OAE (Otoacoustic Emissions) test is a non-invasive, quick, and commonly used hearing screening method. It is a non-behavioral test to access the function of the cochlea, which is the inner ear's sensory organ responsible for detecting sound.

  • Pure Tone Audiometry

    Other intervention

    The PTA testing is a hearing screening method used to assess an individual's ability to hear pure tones at different frequencies and at different sound levels. It is a behavioral test in which a child is conditioned to perform a play-based task upon hearing sounds at multiple frequencies.

Treatment groups

13,764 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Two-stage PTA+OAE hearing screening (TS-PO)Active comparator 2 interventions
Group B: Single-Stage OAE hearing screening (SS-O)Active comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Percentage of participants identified with hearing loss

Percentage of children identified with hearing loss; (number of children identified with hearing loss) / (number of all screened children)

Time frame
6 months after screening

Secondary outcomes

1

Percentage of participants successfully screened

Percentage of all children screened who were successfully screened, which compares the ability of each screening method to adequately screen a diverse population of 2-5-year-old children in a community-based preschool setting; (number of all screened - number of those UNABLE) / (number of all screened)

Time frame
At screening
2

Percentage of participants referred for evaluation after screening

Percentage of children referred after hearing screening; (number of those referred)/(number of all screened)

Time frame
At screening
3

Percentage of participants identified with hearing loss out of all referred

Percentage of children referred that were found to have HL, which reflect the burden on preschools, screening programs, and clinical providers (PCPs and audiologists) due to referrals and false positives; (number of children identified with hearing loss)/(number of all referred)

Time frame
6 months after screening
4

Percentage of children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL)

(number of children identified with SNHL)/(number of all screened)

Time frame
6 months after screening

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of California, San Francisco

Lead sponsor

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Collaborator