About this trial
This study will evaluate a farmworker-level hearing loss prevention training designed to improve hearing protection use among farmworkers exposed to hazardous occupational noise. The intervention consists of a culturally and linguistically adapted, Spanish-language digital training module paired with hands-on earplug fitting and coaching.
The primary goals of the study are to (1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the adapted training in community-based settings, and (2) estimate preliminary effectiveness using an objective measure of hearing protection fit. The study uses a single-arm, pre-post pilot design.
A small group of farmworkers will complete pre- and post-training assessments of earplug fit, as well as brief surveys assessing hearing protection knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Qualitative feedback will be collected to inform refinement of the training and guide future scale-up.
Results will inform the development of a subsequent multilevel intervention that integrates supervisor and organizational components.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adults aged 18 years or older
Currently employed as a farmworker in agricultural settings with routine exposure to occupational noise
Able to understand and provide informed consent in Spanish or English
Disqualifiers
Not currently employed as a farmworker
Medical or ear conditions that preclude safe use of foam earplugs (e.g., acute ear infection, recent ear surgery)
Inability to complete study procedures as determined by study staff
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Farmworker Hearing Protection Training
BehavioralThis behavioral intervention is a brief, farmworker-level hearing protection training. The intervention includes a culturally adapted digital training module (novella-style) focused on noise-induced hearing loss prevention and correct foam earplug use, combined with hands-on earplug fitting and teach-back coaching. The training is delivered in a single session in a community-based setting.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Earplug Fit (Personal Attenuation Rating)
Change in hearing protection fit measured using the Personal Attenuation Rating (PAR), an objective, device-generated fit-testing metric expressed in decibels (dB). PAR quantifies the level of noise attenuation achieved by an individual's foam earplug insertion. PAR values are obtained using standardized hearing protector fit-testing procedures conducted immediately before and immediately after the training session. PAR scores are reported in dB and typically range from 0 dB (no attenuation) to approximately 40 dB or greater depending on fit and device characteristics. Higher PAR values indicate greater attenuation and better earplug fit.
Secondary outcomes
Change in Hearing Protection Beliefs and Attitudes
Change in self-reported beliefs and attitudes toward hearing protection use, assessed using the 14-item Hearing Protection Beliefs scale. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = disagree to 4 = strongly agree) and summed after reverse-coding negatively worded items. Total scores range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating more favorable and accurate beliefs about hearing protection.
Acceptability of the Hearing Protection Training
Participant-reported acceptability of the training assessed immediately post-training using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). The AIM consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Item responses are averaged to generate a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability of the training.
Feasibility of the Hearing Protection Training
Participant-reported feasibility of the training assessed immediately post-training using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The FIM consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Item responses are averaged to generate a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived feasibility of the training.
Appropriateness of the Hearing Protection Training
Participant-reported appropriateness of the training assessed immediately post-training using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). The IAM consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). Item responses are averaged to generate a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived appropriateness of the training.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
San Diego State University
Lead sponsor
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: