PReventive Effect Of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus righT vEntricular paCing on All Cause deaTh, Heart Failure Progression, and Ventricular dysSYNChrony in Patients With Substantial Ventricular Pacing (PROTECT-SYNC): Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorYonsei University

About this trial

PROTECT-SYNC study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 7 medical centers across Republic of Korea will enroll 450 patients during 2 years of enrollment period, and followed for 2 years of follow-up period. The purpose of this study to compare the clinical outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) compared to Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) in bradyarrhythmia patients who require high burden of ventricular pacing (\>40%).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

At least 19 years old and willing and capable to give informed consent

Patients who is willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations.

Disqualifiers

Incapacitated or unable to read or write

Patient who is an indication of ICD or CRT

History of prosthetic valve surgery on tricuspid valve

Prior myocardial infarction including ventricular septum

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Left bundle branch area pacing

    Procedure/Surgery

    LBBAP success is defined if ventricular lead is successfully placed at interventricular septum and RBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing. LBB capture is defined if fulfilling criterion 1 and at least one in criteria 2. 1. RBBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing 2. One of the following should be met: 1. Abrupt shortening of Stim-LVAT (stimulus to peak of the R wave in V6 \[LV activation time\]) of \>10ms during increasing output 2. Short and constant stim-LVAT and the shortest stim-LVAT \<75ms in non-LBBB and \<85ms in LBBB 3. Programmed stimulation by pacing lead changes QRS morphology from nonselective LBB to LV septal capture 4. LBB potential (LBB-V interval of 15 to 35ms) 5. Transition from nonselective LBB capture to selective LBB capture at near threshold outputs If criterion 1 is fulfilled but none in criteria 2 is met, the procedure is considered to be deep septal pacing (DSP).

  • Right ventricular pacing

    Procedure/Surgery

    Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. Implantation of a RV pacing lead (apex or septum of right ventricle) will be attempted using the standard-of-care technique first

Treatment groups

450 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: LBBAP groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: RVP groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, occurrence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy

All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Heart failure hospitalization: An unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy. Occurrence of Pacing induced cardiomyopathy : LVEF \<50% and absolute LVEF decline ≥10% or increase in LVESV ≥15% Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).

Time frame
during 2 years after pacemaker implantation

Secondary outcomes

1

all cause mortality

All cause deaths including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths.

Time frame
during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
2

Cardiovascular mortality

Cardiovascular death

Time frame
during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
3

Heart failure hospitalization

An unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy.

Time frame
during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
4

success rate of LBBAP implantation

LBBAP success is defined if ventricular lead is successfully placed at interventricular septum and RBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing.

Time frame
during 3days after pacemaker implantation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.