PRISM: The PRimary Care Individual Social Norms MSK Data Dashboard: a Feasibility Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity College, London

About this trial

Background:

20 million people in UK have musculoskeletal (MSK) aches and pains. They commonly see their GP about this problem, but practices are so busy that it can mean a long wait for appointments. First Contact Practitioner (FCPs) are now working in the GP practices to see patients with MSK problems instead of their GP. A national evaluation has found this to be working well.

For FCPs working in GP practices there is more clinical risk. The patients have not been previously screened by a doctor to ensure there is no medical cause for their pain. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapists (CSP) has advised that all FCPs be clinicians with the highest level of experience, known as Advanced Practitioners. However the demand for FCPs far outweighs the number of Advanced Practitioners available so physiotherapists being hired have less experience.

Evidence shows that clinicians of different experience levels have different decision-making strategies which may cause unwarranted variation in care. A new method is needed for oversight and support of the FCPs. Clinical supervision is commonly utilised in the NHS and in physiotherapy teams. It is a space to reflect on a clinician's performance and create learning opportunities.

This research suggests an individual data dashboard, shared only with individuals and their supervisor, that feeds back a clinician's own decision-making data to them, relative to their peers. For example, the participant is "in the top 20% of MRI requesters" or "in the top 20% of those referring to social prescribing". This type of feedback is known as 'social norms' feedback. It has been proven to be an effective way to change healthcare workers behaviour. The intervention will be called PRISM: Primary Care Individual Social Norms MSK Data Dashboard.

Aims To explore the feasibility of a randomised clinical trial comparing the clinical decision-making behaviour of FCP services using the PRISM Dashboard and a usual service with no clinician feedback.

Design \& Methods:

This research is a feasibility trial, a process to assess whether a future full scale clinical trial within the NHS would work. It will take place across 4 different Primary Care commissioning areas to determine the possibility of recruitment, retention, outcome collection and whether people will use the intervention.

PPIE for this research included one primary care PPI rep, one digital interventions PPI rep and 3 Healthwatch PPI reps. Engaging different PPI sources enabled participation from different social , cultural and ethnic backgrounds.

Dissemination I will communicate research updates and outputs in conferences, via social media, blogs, newsletters and podcasts. I will use my own network as well as the reach of collaborators in this work, ie. Healthwatch, NHS England/Improvement, The (CSP), the physiotherapy digital network, Keele University and UCL research networks.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

FCPs (First Contact Physiotherapists) must have regular clinical supervision by a more experienced physiotherapist.

Health Care Professionals Council (HCPC) registered Physiotherapists.

Provide physiotherapy to NHS patients.

Able to send monthly data uploads to the UCL Data Safe Haven to be added to the PRISM dashboard.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • PRISM dashboard is a data report

    Behavioral

    The PRISM dashboard captures a clinicians activity relative to their peers. It provides social norms feedback on an array of clinical interventions that an FCP makes.

  • THe usual care intervention is a first contact physiotherapy service.

    Other intervention

    usual care

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: PRISM Intervention GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: usual care groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Feasibility - Number of Participants recruited to the study

The investigators are measuring recruitment so that we can understand the probability that we could recruit to a future trial.

Time frame
Baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

Feasibility - Number of Participants retained to the study at 3 and 6 months

The investigators are measuring retention as a measure of retaining participants to a future trial.

Time frame
3 and 6 months
2

Number of outcomes collected as a measure of feasibility

The feasibility of collecting outcomes at each time point will give the investigators a measure of how feasible it will be to collect outcomes at a future trial.

Time frame
0,3 (patients)and 0,3 and 6 months (FCPs)
3

Completeness of outcomes as a % per outcome

The completeness of outcomes at each time point will give the investigators a measure of how feasible it will be to collect complete outcomes at a future trial. A completion rate for each outcome will be reported.

Time frame
0,3 (patients)and 0,3 and 6 months (FCPs)
4

Feasibility of recording the number of clinical supervision sessions that utilise the PRISM dashboard as recorded in a supervision log

The investigators are measuring use of the intervention in clinical supervision via a supervision log, as a measure of feasibility of a future trial.

Time frame
monthly for 6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University College, London

Lead sponsor

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Collaborator

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Collaborator