PRO-GLIO: PROton Versus Photon Therapy in IDH-mutated Diffuse Grade II and III GLIOmas

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorOslo University Hospital

About this trial

Proton therapy is a powerful tool enabling oncologists to spare normal tissue around the target for irradiation much better than what can be achieved with photon irradiation. The infiltrative nature of IDH-mutated grade II and III diffuse glioma, however, renders proton therapy a potential problem. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the only option when trying to ensure that chances of long-term survival are not impaired seeking to reduce unwanted late treatment effects. Non-inferiority of proton therapy compared to photon irradiation is the primary endpoint of the RCT.

Hence, PRO-GLIO has two main objectives. First, PRO-GLIO will evaluate if proton therapy is safe in patients with IDH-mutated grade II and III diffuse glioma, showing that survival figures at 2 years from radiotherapy are not poorer in the proton arm than in the photon arm. Second, we want to find the true number of patients in need of rehabilitation in both arms, and evaluate if proton therapy conveys a higher QoL than photon irradiation at 2 years from radiotherapy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients must be 18 to 65 years old on the day of consent.

IDH-mutated astrocytoma grade 2 or 3, or oligodendroglioma grade 2 or 3 according to WHO 2021.

Indication for radiotherapy.

WHO/ECOG performance status 0-2.

Disqualifiers

Prior treatment (except surgery) for diffuse glioma

Concomitant or previous malignancies. Exceptions are adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri with a follow-up time of at least 3 years, or other previous malignancy with a disease-free interval of at least 5 years

Known CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion

Presence of any medical, psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical characteristic that might impair patient compliance for study protocol procedures including follow-up

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Radiation therapy

    Radiation

    Radiation therapy either with protons or photons

Treatment groups

225 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Radiation therapy with protonsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Radiation therapy with photonsActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

First intervention free survival (FIFS) at 2 years

Survival

Time frame
2 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Total fatigue score assessed by the fatigue questionnaire developed by T. Chalder et al.

Symptom

Time frame
2, 5, 10 and 15 years
2

Change in cognitive functioning (composite score from CANTAB-tests) at 2 years

Objective examination

Time frame
5 months and 2, 5, 10 and 15 years
3

Overall survival

Survival

Time frame
Median and at 2, 5, 10 and 15 years
4

FIFS

Survival

Time frame
Median, 5, 10 and 15 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Oslo University Hospital

Lead sponsor

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Collaborator

The Skandion Clinic

Collaborator

University Hospital of North Norway

Collaborator

St. Olavs Hospital

Collaborator

Haukeland University Hospital

Collaborator

Lund University Hospital

Collaborator

Ôrebro University Hospital

Collaborator

Uppsala University Hospital

Collaborator

Karolinska University Hospital

Collaborator

University Hospital, Umeå

Collaborator

University Hospital, Linkoeping

Collaborator

Ryhov County Hospital

Collaborator