Producing Increasingly Complex Themes Using Right-hemisphere Engagement (PICTURE) Implemented With Telemedicine

ConditionsAphasiaStroke
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorJohns Hopkins University

About this trial

The investigators propose a pilot crossover trial of 2 behavioral language treatments, with randomized order of treatments and blinded assessors, to determine if a therapy designed to stimulate right hemisphere functions (Producing Increasingly Complex Themes Using Right-hemisphere Engagement Implemented with Telemedicine - PICTURE IT; described below) is more effective in improving discourse than a published computer delivered lexical treatment (shown previously to improve naming) in subacute post-stroke aphasia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 or older

Premorbid proficiency in English

Left hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by imaging, which occurred either 1-4 months or ≥ 6 months ago

Diagnosis of aphasia secondary to stroke as defined using the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient < 93.8.

Disqualifiers

Prior history of neurologic disease affecting the brain (e.g., brain tumor, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury) other than stroke

Prior history of severe psychiatric illness, developmental disorders or intellectual disability (e.g., PTSD, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders)

Inability to follow the treatment procedure as indicated by appropriate (not necessarily accurate) engagement during 5 probes of each.

Uncorrected severe visual loss or hearing loss by self-report and medical records

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • PICTURE-IT

    Behavioral

    The speech-language pathologist (SLP) will provide one of the following stimuli hierarchically: 1. Single words depicted in the picture, then with written and spoken labels 2. 2-word phrases depicted in the picture and then with written and spoken word 3. Subject-Verb-Object sentence depicted in the picture and then with written and spoken sentences 4. Two-sentence event, depicted with photos and subsequently with two written and spoken sentences 5. Short story depicted with a video clip and subsequently with printed and spoken narrative. Sessions will be completed online with a speech-language pathologist using video conferencing software, using a laptop and a hot spot the investigators will provide if needed. Participants in both groups will receive the same 15 45-minute sessions of a PICTURE-IT.

  • CoDeLT

    Behavioral

    The speech-language pathologist (SLP) will facilitate the computer-delivered naming treatment, consisting of a picture/seen and heard spoken word verification task. A picture will be presented for two seconds on a laptop computer screen and will be immediately followed by an audio-visual display of a speaker's mouth saying a noun, phrase, or sentence. The spoken word, phrase, or sentence either will or will not fit the preceding picture, and the participant must indicate whether the picture and video match or do not match. The computer will provide immediate visual feedback following a response. Sessions will be completed online with a speech-language pathologist using video conferencing software, using a laptop and a hot spot the investigators will provide if needed. Participants in both groups will receive the same 15 45-minute sessions of a PICTURE-IT.

Treatment groups

70 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: PICTURE IT Intervention-CoDeLT InterventionExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: CoDeLT Intervention-PICTURE IT InterventionActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in discourse content as assessed by z-score for the number of meaning-carrying units used in describing a picture

Change in z-score for the number of meaning-carrying units used in describing a picture. There is no maximum number of meaning-carrying units, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.

Time frame
Baseline, 1 week after treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in discourse informational efficiency as assessed by z-score for the number of syllables of meaning-carrying units used in describing a picture

Change in z-score for the number of syllables/number of meaning-carrying units used in describing a picture. There is no maximum number of meaning-carrying units, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.

Time frame
Baseline, 1 week after treatment
2

Change in accuracy of naming objects as assessed by the Boston Naming Test

Change in accuracy of naming objects on the 30-item Boston Naming Test. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.

Time frame
Baseline, 1 week after treatment
3

Change in accuracy of naming actions as assessed by the Hopkins Action Naming Assessment form

Change in accuracy of naming actions on the 30-item Hopkins Action Naming Assessment. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.

Time frame
Baseline, 1 week after treatment
4

Change in resting state functional connectivity as assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy

Measure of correlation between activation of brain regions at rest using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Right hemisphere intrahemispheric, left hemisphere intrahemispheric, and interhemispheric measures will be examined.

Time frame
Baseline, 1 week after treatment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.