Promoting Socioemotional Development in Early Childhood: Implementation and Evaluation of the VIPP-SD Parenting Intervention in Portugal

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-5
SponsorISPA - Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Psicologicas, Sociais e da Vida

About this trial

The Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD) is an attachment-based intervention aimed at promoting parental sensitivity and the use of developmentally appropriate, non-coercive discipline strategies (ref). The VIPP-SD intervention integrates the enhancement of parental sensitive responsiveness (Ainsworth et al., 1974) with parent coaching aimed at preventing coercive parent-child interaction cycles (Patterson, 1982) and facilitating sensitive limit-setting practices.ase parental sensitivity and sensitive discipline of the primary parent

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • VIPP-SD

    Other intervention

    Consists of four sessions (with the option of one or two additional booster sessions), held biweekly, depending on the family's needs and availability. Specifically, VIPP-SD addresses disciplinary strategies alongside sensitivity themes through: (1) the differentiation between attachment and exploration behaviors; interpretation of child's behavior and significance of a sensitive response to it; and the importance of sharing emotions (2) the application of distraction and induction as non-coercive techniques in response to challenging child behaviours or conflict-prone situations; (3) the utilization of positive reinforcement, whereby parents praise adaptive behaviours and ignore maladaptive, attention-seeking actions; (4) the implementat of a sensitive interaction pause to de-escalate conflict or temper tantrums; and (5) the demonstration of empathy towards the child in conjunction with consistent disciplinary approaches and explicit boundary-setting

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention with VIPP-SDActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Control Group: No interventionNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Parental sensitivity: Erickson Scales of Parental Sensitivity (ESPS, Egeland, et al., 1990)

Parental sensitivity will be assessed using the the revised Erickson 7-point rating scales for Supportive Presence (from 1 = parent completely fails to be supportive to the child to 7 = parent skilfully provides support throughout the session) and Intrusiveness (from 1 = parent allows the child sufficient time to explore and to attempt to solve tools on her/his own to 7 = parent is highly intrusive; her agenda clearly has precedence over the child's wishes; Egeland et al., 1990). Supportive presence is defined as the consistent emotional, physical, and psychological availability of a mother, characterized by both verbal expressions and nonverbal behaviors. High sensitivity is associated with positive developmental outcomes in children, including secure attachment and better emotional regulation. Intrusiveness reflects the extent to which a parent disregards or interferes with the child's autonomy, wishes, interests, or behaviors.

Time frame
Data will be collected at pretest, posttest (14 weeks) .

Secondary outcomes

1

Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire" (SDQ Portuguese version Fleitlich et al., 2004)

The assessment tool used in this study is a 25-item questionnaire designed to evaluate emotional and behavioral problems in children aged 2 to 17 years, with responses provided by parents. The items are rated on a 3-point scale: 0 = "Not true," 1 = "A bit true," and 2 = "Very true." The questionnaire is structured into five subscales: (1) emotional symptoms, (2) conduct problems, (3) hyperactivity, (4) peer problems, and (5) prosocial behavior. For this study, only the parent version of the questionnaire is utilized. The total difficulties score is derived by summing the first four subscales (excluding prosocial behavior), yielding a score ranging from 0 to 40.

Time frame
Data will be collected at pretest, posttest (14 weeks) and follow up (12 weeks).
2

Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21)

The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21; Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995; Portuguese version: Apóstolo et al., 2006) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in parents. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Did not apply to me at all) to 3 (Applied to me most of the time). The scale comprises three subscales: Depression (7 items), which assesses dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest or involvement, anhedonia, and inertia; Anxiety (7 items), which measures autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety, and the subjective experience of anxious affect; Stress (7 items), which evaluates chronic, nonspecific arousal, including difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, irritability, agitation, and impatience. Subscale and total scores are calculated by summing the item responses.

Time frame
Data will be collected at pretest, posttest (14 weeks) and follow up (12 weeks).
3

AQOL-8D (Richardson & Lezzi, 2014)

Quality of life among caregivers will be measured with the Assessing Quality of Life - 8 Dimensions (AQOL-8D) (Richardson \& Lezzi, 2014) is a multi-attribute utility instrument developed to provide a sensitive and comprehensive assessment of health status among adults across eight dimensions,, including independent living, mental health, coping, relationships, pain, self-worth, happiness and senses) and 35 items with four to six response levels, each representing increasing levels of severity. This measure will be used for economic evaluation.

Time frame
Data will be collected at pretest, posttest (14 weeks) and follow up (12 weeks).
4

Resource Use Characterization Questionnaire.

Resources used by children and their parents will be measured using a questionnaire adapted from published questionnaires by Bouwmans et al, 2013 and Pokhilenko et al. 2023. Resource use will include healthcare services (accident and emergency visits, primary care and specialized outpatient visits and inpatient stays, medication), social services, transportation, absenteeism and presenteeism from both paid and unpaid work, and out-of-pocket expenses. This measure will be used for economic evaluation.

Time frame
Data will be collected at pretest, posttest (14 weeks) and follow up (12 weeks).

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.