About this trial
There is prove of prolapse prevention in vaginal hysterectomy using the McCall suture. Poor and especially no long-term data exists for a standardized laparoscopic approach, but the few studies could show good anatomic results.
The aim is to test the effectiveness of the laparoscopic McCall suture compared to usual vaginal cuff closure in a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
LSC simple hysterectomy,
Neg. SS test if premenopausal
>18j,
Consent to participate in the study
Disqualifiers
Prolapse as indication for surgery
Known or suspected non-compliance
Additional incontinence procedures
Patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
McCall suture
Procedure/SurgeryLaparoscopic suture including the uterosacral ligaments and the peritoneum
Standard cuff closure
Procedure/SurgeryStandard laparoscopic barbed suture of the vaginal cuff
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Prolapse of the apical compartment. Primary Quantification by the Pelvic organ prolapse Scoring system (POP-Q) Depending on vaginal length, it could vary between +10 and -10cm.
Primary Quantification by the Pelvic organ prolapse Scoring system (POP-Q), ranges from -10 (low) to +10 (high), better outcome with higher score endpoint is the prolapse of the apical compartment (point D in the POP-Q score, vaginal dome in relation to the hymen) after 5 years. Point D is a value measured in centimeters. Depending on vaginal length, it could vary between +10 and -10cm. Reference point of all measurements is the hymen.
Secondary outcomes
Sexual function
Quantification by the Female Sexual Function Index, Score 0 - 5, better outcome with higher score
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.