Prospective Study of ProteiOS in Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorIsto Biologics

About this trial

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Participants undergoing 1- to 2-level TLIF (L2-S1) are randomized 2:1 to receive ProteiOS or a control graft (local bone with optional cancellous chip augmentation, no ProteiOS). The primary objective is to determine whether the 12-month interbody fusion rate (assessed by CT using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification) with ProteiOS is non-inferior to control, using a 5-percentage-point non-inferiority margin. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L), safety, and healthcare utilization are also assessed. A separate exploratory cohort at one study site will evaluate the same outcomes in participants undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without ProteiOS, without formal hypothesis testing.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18-75 years, skeletally mature at time of surgery

Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented TLIF, with or without posterolateral fusion, as determined by the treating surgeon

For the ALIF study site only: degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented ALIF

Radiographic evidence of degenerative lumbar disease on CT, MRI, or plain radiograph (decreased disc height, herniated nucleus pulposus, ligamentum flavum/annulus hypertrophy, facet arthrosis/osteophyte, spinal canal or foraminal stenosis, or vertebral translation >3 mm)

Disqualifiers

Scheduled for surgery with synthetic bone grafts containing hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or other radio-opaque material

BMI >40

Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at a level currently scheduled for surgery

Malignancy or treatment for malignancy within the last 5 years (benign skin cancer permitted)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)

    Other intervention

    Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice

  • Standard of Care (SOC)

    Other intervention

    Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation

Treatment groups

280 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: TLIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: TLIF - ControlActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: ALIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: ALIF - ControlActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis)

Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

Time frame
12 months
2

Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

Time frame
12 Months
3

Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological

Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council \[MRC\] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).

Time frame
12 Months
4

Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

Time frame
12 Months

Secondary outcomes

1

Fusion (via Computed Tomography (CT))

Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.

Time frame
6 and 24 months
2

Fusion (x ray)

Percentage of participants achieving fusion by X-ray. Interbody fusion (all participants): Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification, Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion); success = Grade 3; higher grade = better.

Time frame
3, 6, 12, 24 months
3

Adverse Events

Nature (descriptive) and frequency (number) of procedure and biologic related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Time frame
24 months
4

Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.

Time frame
3, 6, 24 Months

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: