About this trial
Prostate ART is a two phase study looking at using adaptive radiotherapy to help reduce toxicity for prostate cancer patients.
Adaptive radiotherapy is a new technology that provides the ability to account for daily changes in anatomy. Adaptive radiotherapy also provides a foundation for which radiotherapy margins might be safely reduced.
Phase 1 of this study is looking to see if a radiation therapist centred adaptive workflow can be implemented. If phase 1 of this study is safe and feasible, the study will proceed to phase 2.
Part 2 of the study looks at using adaptive technology to reduce radiation treatment margins. The primary aim of this study is to see whether margin reduced treatment using adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects for prostate cancer patients.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
- Age > 18
Biopsy proven prostate malignancy
Definitive treatment is radiotherapy to the prostate alone
ECOG performance status 0-2
Disqualifiers
Hip prosthesis
Patient separation from prostate centre to skin edge > 24cm, measured on diagnostic scan-
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Adaptive radiotherapy +/- Margin Reduction
RadiationRadiotherapy using adaptive technology to recontour and replan daily as required. Reductions in the PTV margin will also be introduced in the second phase of this study.
Image guided radiotherapy
RadiationStandard radiation treatment used in the department of radiation oncology for prostate cancer
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Safety of Adaptive Radiation Therapy via Radiation Therapists-led* treatment delivery (CTV coverage)
A comparison of Clinical Target Volume (CTV) dose coverage will be performed. The CTV dose coverage must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction. Dose coverage will be calculated as the percent of CTV receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (TD).
Safety of Adaptive Radiation Therapy via Radiation Therapists-led* treatment delivery (OAR DVH constraints)
A comparison of organ at risk (OAR) dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints will be performed. The OAR DVH dose constraints must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction.
Feasibility of ART via RT-led* treatment delivery
At least 90% of patients must have 90% of planned adaptive treatments successfully delivered in phase 1 of the study.
Acute patient reported toxicity
The study will measure the difference in patient reported combined maximum GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) as per PRO-CTCAE between the two treatment arms.
Secondary outcomes
Acute clinician reported toxicity
The study will measure the difference in acute combined maximum GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) grading between the two treatment arms as reported by clinicians using CTCAE v5.0
Late clinician reported toxicity
The study will measure the difference in late GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) between the two treatment arms as reported by clinicians using CTCAE v5.0
Late patient reported toxicity
The study will measure the difference in patient reported late GU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) between the two treatment arms as per PRO-CTCAE.
Biochemical progression Free Survival
The rate of biochemical failure as defined as Nadir+2.0, commencement of ADT for relapse or evidence of disease recurrence on imaging
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Royal North Shore Hospital
Lead sponsor
Northern Sydney and Central Coast Area Health Service
Collaborator