Prostate Cancer Care Disparity Analysis Project (ProGAP)

ConditionProstate CA
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorAnkara University

About this trial

This international cross-sectional study seeks to evaluate global disparities in prostate cancer management by conducting a thorough comparison of key elements across countries categorized as low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income.

The primary question it addresses is: Are the standards of care for prostate cancer uniformly applied across different geographic regions worldwide? To achieve this, we will recruit physicians specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer from a diverse array of countries within these income classifications. Participants will complete a 17-question online survey.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Healthcare professionals actively treating prostate cancer patients-such as urologists, uro-oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists-who specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer, representing a diverse range of countries categorized as low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Cross-sectional

Treatments tested in this trial

  • No Intervention: Observational Cohort

    Other intervention

    No Intervention: Observational Cohort

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Healthcare professionals for prostate cancer1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Characterization of global disparities in prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management practices

Comparative analyses will be conducted using survey data to reveal disparities between different regions and healthcare settings. The findings will be presented as percentages of respondents, with territorial and institutional differences thoroughly evaluated. Participants will be categorized into three groups based on the World Bank\'s income classification: low and lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income countries. Descriptive statistics will be employed to compare demographic characteristics and clinical practices. For categorical data analysis, the Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher\'s Exact test will be utilized, while ANOVA tests will be applied to independent variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Time frame
One month

Secondary outcomes

1

Assessment of access to care, encompassing advanced diagnostic tools, treatment modalities, and patient support services; analysis of adherence to guidelines and its effect on treatment outcomes

Identifying the percentage of healthcare professionals across various geographic regions who have access to diagnostic and treatment methods that align with established guidelines, and evaluating the impact of these methods on treatment outcomes. The findings will be presented as percentages of respondents, with territorial and institutional differences thoroughly examined.

Time frame
One month

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.