About this trial
In the United State, there are millions of US teens who are not vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV) putting them at risk of getting HPV-related cancers. Although there are clinical guidelines recommending the HPV vaccine and interventions encouraging parents to vaccinate their children to prevent HPV-related cancers, the vaccination rate for teens remains low according to a 2018 national survey. Survey data shows that HPV vaccine complete series coverage for teens aged 13-15 years was 50%, far below the 80% target of Healthy People 2020. Receiving a strong provider recommendation is the most powerful strategy for improving HPV vaccine rates. Yet, little is known about how to include provider recommendations and other important factors into an intervention to improve the HPV vaccination rates. Studies show there are provider, patient and system-level barriers in the initiation and completion of HPV vaccine series among 9-12 years old children. Barriers to the HPV vaccine also differ across demographic subgroups, communities, and clinics. Interventions that address only one component are not responsive to site barriers and as effective as one that addresses multiple components and site-specific barriers. This study uses a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare three implementation strategies to improve provider recommendations on the HPV vaccine. Two of the implementation strategies (local-tailored and prescribed strategy) utilize a multilevel approach. The three implementation strategies of interest are (1) a "local-tailored" implementation strategy, co-designed with local care teams to address local barriers and contexts (2) A "prescribed" strategy, most commonly used by health systems, that involves pre-specified interventions addressing pre-selected vaccination barriers and (3) usual standard of care where there are no research-led activities. We will use surveys, interviews, and electronic health records to evaluate the three implementation strategies and their impact on improving HPV vaccination rates. The study surveys and interviews will include pediatric providers, nurses, administrators, staff members, and parents of HPV vaccine-eligible children (9-12 years old). Successful implementation will be defined as improvement in HPV vaccination rates (primary outcome), strengthening provider recommendation (secondary outcome), and the cost-effectiveness of the implementation strategy.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
All KPSC pediatric clinics.
All providers (physicians, nurses, and medical assistants) and department administrators from the pediatric department.
Parents of HPV vaccine-eligible children (9-12 years old).
Disqualifiers
Providers and administrators who do not work for the pediatric department
Parents of children older than 12 years and/or who did not have a clinic visit in the study period.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Local Tailoring implementation strategy
Other interventionThe "local-tailored" approach will be guided by a structured process involving the following: (1) convening a local HPV vaccine project team, (2) conducting a local diagnostic process to identify top barriers, (3) selecting from a menu of intervention options that will be offered in this study, categorized by core function (i.e., the forms and functions menu) that address top local barriers, and (4) deploying the selected interventions. The barrier assessment and intervention customization are key processes for the local-tailored strategy, which allow clinics to devote resources to respond to unique local barriers in addition to common barriers.
Prescribed Strategy
Other interventionThe prescribed strategy is the standard implementation approach used by most health systems. Our prescribed approach will be guided by the evidence-based, award-winning 4 Pillars™ Practice Transformation Program for improving vaccination rates in the outpatient setting. The 4 Pillars™ address 4 main "functions", i.e., convenience, communication, office systems, and motivation to guide the selection of interventions. For adolescent HPV vaccination, the 4 Pillars has demonstrated moderate effectiveness.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Proportion of children 9-12 years old who received the first dose of the HPV vaccine -EMR
9-12 years old who received the first dose of the HPV vaccine at pre-intervention. Data obtained from electronic medical record (EMR)
Proportion of children 9-12 years old who received the first dose of the HPV vaccine - EMR
9-12 years old who received the first dose of the HPV vaccine at post-intervention
Secondary outcomes
Provider Recommendation - survey
Questions to assess time spent on recommending the HPV vaccine, frequency of recommending the vaccine and content of discussion. In the baseline parent survey, we will ask questions regarding what the physician mentioned regarding the HPV vaccine and perception on how the information was discussed. We will derive a recommendation quality score.
Provider Recommendation - survey
At post-intervention, surveys will include questions to assess time spent on recommending the HPV vaccine, frequency of recommending the vaccine and content of discussion. We will derive a recommendation quality score.
Other outcomes
HPV vaccine series completion - EMR
9-12 year old who received 2 doses of the HPV vaccine during data collection period
Time taken to recommend the HPV vaccine - survey
Time taken by provider to recommend the HPV vaccine at pre-intervention.
Time taken to recommend the HPV vaccine - survey
Time taken by provider to recommend the HPV vaccine at post-intervention.
Perceived comfort/distress in discussing HPV vaccination with parents - survey
Provider perception on comfort/distress in discussing the vaccine at pre-intervention.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Kaiser Permanente
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator