About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if removing and replacing part of the hip bone works better than using metal hardware to stabilize the bone in patients whose cancer has spread to the hip. The main questions are:
1. Does removing and replacing part of the bone work better than just stabilizing it with metal hardware? 2. Does removing and replacing the bone help reduce problems like cancer coming back or the metal hardware breaking?
Researchers will compare two treatments: using metal rods and plates to stabilize the bone (internal fixation) versus removing part of the bone and possibly replacing the hip joint (resection and reconstruction) to see if the second option causes fewer problems.
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to one of two groups (internal fixation or resection and reconstruction). * Have one of the two surgeries based on which group they're in. * Go to follow-up appointments with the study doctor at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after surgery.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Life expectancy of at least 6 months
Lesions in the proximal femur (femoral neck, intertrochanteric region, subtrochanteric region, and combinations thereof)
Low or intermediate risk for perioperative morbidity and/or mortality
No more than 75% and no less than 25% bone loss
Disqualifiers
Lesions isolated to the femoral neck
Lesion with any femoral head involvement
High risk for perioperative morbidity and/or mortality
Multidisciplinary decision that resection of the entire lesion would be indicated
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Internal Fixation
Procedure/SurgeryInternal Fixation
Resection and reconstruction
Procedure/SurgeryResection and reconstruction
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Mortality at 12 months
Collected through case report forms via electronic medical records and patient/ caregiver self-reported.
Physical function
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Global Physical Function score: To what extent are you able to carry out your everyday physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, carrying groceries, or moving a chair? Answer options include: Completely (best outcome); Mostly; Moderately; A little; Not at all (worst outcome)
Number of days at home
Patient self- reported via patient diary.
Secondary outcomes
Quality of life- PROMIS-PROPr (PROMIS-Preference) health utility score
PROMIS-PROPr (PROMIS-Preference) utility score - encompassing mental and physical health, and quality of life. The PROMIS-PROPr combines scores from seven PROMIS domains into a single preference-based score (also called a health utility score), which captures the preferences of the general adult population. The total number of items that the patient answers are 31. This instrument gives four different scores: health utility score, domain level scores (one for each of the following domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social roles and activities, pain interference, cognition, and pain intensity), physical component score, and a mental component score. Answer options include: Not at all (1); A little bit (2); Somewhat (3); Quite a bit (4); Very much (5).
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Michelle Ghert, MD
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Sponsor institution
Canadian Cancer Society (CCS)
Collaborator