PULSE - Patient Understanding and Learning Through Structured Education - Effectiveness and Implementation of Patient Education Videos in a New Pediatric Cardiology Clinic

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeUp to 18
SponsorDriscoll Children's Hospital

About this trial

This study is looking at whether short educational videos shown during pediatric cardiology visits can help families better understand their child's condition while also making clinic visits run more efficiently. Families coming to a pediatric cardiology clinic may watch short videos related to why they are there (for example: chest pain, heart murmurs, fainting, sports clearance, or Kawasaki disease). The videos are meant to explain common heart-related conditions and answer questions before the doctor comes into the room.

Researchers want to see if this:

* helps parents and patients learn more, * improves satisfaction with the visit, * helps families feel more involved in decisions, * and reduces the amount of time doctors spend repeating the same explanations.

How the study works:

One clinic site in San Antonio, TX will start using the videos at different times. Researchers will compare clinic visits before and after the videos are introduced.

Who is included:

Children being seen in pediatric cardiology clinics and their caregivers. Pregnant women referred for fetal heart evaluations may also be included.

What information is collected:

Clinic timing information (such as wait times and doctor visit length), Satisfaction surveys, Optional knowledge questionnaires, Basic medical record information needed for the study.

Risk level: The study is considered "minimal risk." Patients are still getting normal medical care. No drugs, devices, or experimental treatments are being tested.

Privacy protections:

Data will be stored on secure hospital systems. Researchers plan to remove identifying information when analyzing results. Medical record numbers are only temporarily used to connect survey data with clinic data.

Why the study matters:

The clinic hopes the videos can make visits less stressful, improve understanding for families, and help doctors spend more time on personalized care instead of repeating the same explanations over and over. It may also help clinics work more efficiently and reduce delays.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Pediatric patients (ages 0-18 years) presenting for outpatient pediatric cardiology evaluation

Caregiver present and able to complete surveys

Referral reason matches available video topic (during intervention periods)

Disqualifiers

Emergency or urgent consultations

Caregiver unable to read/understand English or Spanish

Patient/family opts out of study participation

Trial design

Design model

Sequential

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Room-based educational video: Murmur, Chest Pain

    Other intervention

    Video topics will be matched to patient referral reason: Murmur, Chest Pain

  • Room-based educational video: Syncope, Palpitations

    Other intervention

    Video topics will be matched to patient referral reason: Syncope, Palpitations

  • Room-based educational video: Sports Clearance, Kawasaki, General

    Other intervention

    Video topics will be matched to patient referral reason: Sports Clearance, Kawasaki, General

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Group A: Murmur, Chest PainActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Group B: Syncope, PalpitationsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Group C: Sports Clearance, Kawasaki, GeneralActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Physician encounter time (minutes)

Measured from physician room entry to exit via electronic health record (EHR) timestamps or direct observation.

Time frame
During the 12 months of study interventions.

Secondary outcomes

1

Clinic throughput

Patients/session: Measured through timestamps (check-in, rooming, physician entry, discharge), visit type, referral reason and Provider schedules, patient volume

Time frame
During the 12 months of study interventions.
2

Shared decision-making quality

CollaboRATE Shared Decision Making Score, 0-100. The CollaboRATE measure provides a performance score representing the percentage of adults 18 and older who experience a high level of shared decision making.

Time frame
During the 12 months of study interventions.
3

Family knowledge

5-item condition-specific quiz

Time frame
During the 12 months of study interventions.
4

Patient satisfaction

single-item 5-point scale

Time frame
During the 12 months of study interventions.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.