Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat PVI in Patients With Paroxysmal AF

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorUniversity Medical Center Groningen

About this trial

Various methods exist for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including thermal ablation and pulse-field ablation (PFA). However, in cases requiring a second PVI for recurrent AF, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized in nearly 95% of instances post-acquiring a 3D high-density map from the left atrium (LA). Up to 85% of patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI exhibit pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, often identified as the cause of AF.

PFA has demonstrated its safety and efficiency compared to RFA as a swift technique for performing ablation. Yet, whether PFA or RFA stands out as superior or safer when applied for a second PVI remains unclear, as no randomized controlled trial has investigated this comparison. The proposed REPEAT-AF trial aims to randomize 154 AF patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI, assigning them in a 1:1 ratio to either RFA or PFA. Each patient will receive an implantable cardiac monitor to precisely detect any AF recurrences.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient had 1 previous PVI with either cryoballoon, RF ablation or PFA

Index PVI occurred within <5 years prior to enrolment

Documented AF recurrence >30 seconds

Symptomatic AF

Disqualifiers

Persistent AF (by diagnosis of duration >7 days)

Concomitant/ prior diagnosis for atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFl). Note typical cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter is not an exclusion criterium.

Underwent additional ablations outside the pulmonary veins during index AF ablation

AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol abuse, or other reversible/non-cardiac causes

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • pulmonary vein isolation with RFA

    Device

    Patients randomised to RFA will undergo PVI with point-by-point RFA.

  • pulmonary vein isolation with PFA

    Device

    Patients randomised to PFA will undergo PVI with PFA.

Treatment groups

154 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Radiofrequency ablationActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Pulsed field ablationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.

12-month incidence of AF/AFl/AT recurrence.

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.

24-month incidence of AF/AFl/AT recurrence.

Time frame
24 months
2

Repeat PVI within 12 and 24 months of randomization

Repeat PVI

Time frame
12 and 24 months
3

AF burden with and without 3 months blanking period

Proportion of cumulative time in AF divided by the total time accrued over follow-up

Time frame
12 and 24 months
4

Change in quality of life

As measured by EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire

Time frame
12 and 24 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Medical Center Groningen

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation

Collaborator