Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAula Dental Avanzada
About this trial
This is a randomized multicenter clinical study that compares two static guided surgery techniques in free-end partial edentulism.
The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients who present to one of the two participating clinics with a posterior edentulous area starting from the second premolar.
Patients in whom the placement of dental implants is not contraindicated.
Disqualifiers
Patients with hypersensitivities or allergies that contraindicate the intervention.
Presence of orofacial neurological symptoms.
Patients treated with bisphosphonates.
Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women undergoing contraceptive treatment.
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Dental implant placement
Procedure/SurgeryPlacement of two dental implants in the jaw.
Treatment groups
40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Tooth supported guideActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Bone and tooth supported guideExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by intraoral scan and planning software)
Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using an intraoral scanner (Medit i700®) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points.
Time frame
From enrollment to the end of surgerySecondary outcomes
1
Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by CBCT and planning software)
Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points.
Time frame
From enrollment to the end of surgerySponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Aula Dental Avanzada
Lead sponsor
Mozo Grau Ticare
Collaborator
Source ClinicalTrials.gov