Randomized Trial of UI-EWD vs. Conventional Endoscopic Therapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age22+
SponsorMedtronic - MITG

About this trial

A prospective, multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) hemostatic powder versus conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients presenting with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding which is found at endoscopy to be due to one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults age 22 years or older

Presentation with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia)

Subject voluntarily agrees to participate in the clinical investigation, provides written informed consent, and will be able to comply with the investigational protocol in the opinion of the site investigator

Cause of bleeding as determined at upper endoscopy is one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear. The definition of "active oozing" will require bleeding to persist for ≥ 3 minutes of endoscopic observation.

Disqualifiers

Incarceration

Subjects that are not able to provide written informed consent

Pregnancy or nursing mothers

Endoscopic hemostatic treatment in the past 30 days

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • UI-EWD

    Device

    Hemostatic powder administered at index endoscopy

  • Conventional therapy

    Device

    Conventional endoscopic therapy (bipolar electrocoagulation or clips or argon plasma coagulation, with or without epinephrine injection) administered at index endoscopy

Treatment groups

278 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Test GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

No further bleeding during the 7-day period after hemostatic treatment

Further bleeding includes patients with persistent bleeding despite study-assigned endoscopic therapy or patients with recurrent bleeding

Time frame
7 days

Secondary outcomes

1

Composite 30-day outcome of further bleeding

Further bleeding leading to red blood cell transfusion or urgent intervention (need for alternative therapy at index endoscopy, repeat endoscopy, interventional radiology, or surgery)

Time frame
30 days
2

Initial hemostasis for patients with active bleeding at randomization

Initial hemostasis with study-assigned endoscopic therapy for patients with active bleeding

Time frame
During index endoscopy procedure
3

Number of participants with recurrent bleeding over the 7-day period after randomization

Recurrent bleeding among all patients with hemostasis within 7 days after study-assigned endoscopic therapy

Time frame
7 days
4

Mortality

30-day mortality

Time frame
30 days

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Medtronic - MITG

Lead sponsor

North American Science Associates Ltd.

Collaborator