About this trial
600 comatose patients admitted to the hospital in China from June 2024 to June 2028 were randomly divided into groups A and B. Group A used intermittent negative pressure suction through oral and pharyngeal ventilation, while group B used continuous negative pressure suction through regular oral and nasal suction.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
1. Clinical diagnosis of stroke; 2. Clinical diagnosis of comatose;
Disqualifiers
1. Clinical diagnosis of multiple organ failure; 2. Clinical diagnosis of multiple organ bleeding;
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
continuous negative pressure suction
Procedure/Surgery(1) Open the mouth with a tongue depressor; (2) Apply paraffin oil to the front end of the sputum suction tube; (3) Insert a suction tube into the mouth to aspirate phlegm.
Intermittent negative pressure sputum suction through oral pharyngeal airway
Procedure/Surgery(1) Insert the oropharyngeal airway parallel into the oral cavity; (2) Apply paraffin oil to the front end of the sputum suction tube; (3) The suction tube is inserted into the deep oral cavity through the middle lumen of the oropharyngeal airway; (4) Intermittent negative pressure for suction and suction of sputum
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Blood oxygen saturation before and after sputum aspiration
The degree of binding between oxygen and hemoglobin (Hb) in arterial blood
Suctioning time
All time required for sputum suction process
Degree of airway bleeding
Use a disposable sputum collection device to aspirate sputum for patients and differentiate the blood content under a blue LED light.
Secondary outcomes
Patient family satisfaction
After suctioning, use a satisfaction questionnaire to survey the operating nurses, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5. The higher the value, the higher the satisfaction.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.