Rate of Return to Sport After Total Knee Prosthesis: Comparison of Three Types of Prostheses

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-70
SponsorGCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche

About this trial

The purpose of the study is the rate of return to sport (regardless of the sport envisaged) after a minimum of 3 years after total knee prosthesis.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

First total knee prosthesis between 2018 and 2020;

Conventional alignment technique using the same surgical technique for total knee prosthesis;

Placement of a medial pivot prosthesis (Evolution®), mobile bearing (SCORE® Amplitude) or traditional cruciate retaining prosthesis (Stryker® Triathlon);

Affiliation to a social security scheme;

Disqualifiers

Bilateral total knee prosthesis;

Medical history of revision of Total Knee Prosthesis;

Articulation malformation of the lower limbs;

Having undergone revision surgery;

Trial population

Patients are eligible on retrospective criteria. These are patients who underwent total knee prosthesis surgery between 2018 and 2020 with placement of a medial pivot, medial bearing and cruciate retaining type prosthesis.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Other

Treatments tested in this trial

  • total knee prosthesis

    Other intervention

    Comparison of three cohorts on the return to sport of patients after total knee prosthesis according to the type of prosthesis

Treatment groups

660 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: medial pivot1 intervention
Group B: medial bearing1 intervention
Group C: cruciate retaining1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

rate of return to sport

rate of return to sport after a minimum of 3 years after total knee prosthesis

Time frame
3 years

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.