Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Non-thermal Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to clarify the role of adjuvant thermal ablation for non-thermal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥20mm) flat colorectal polyps (so-called laterally spreading lesions \[LSLs\]).

The hypothesis is that adding adjuvant thermal ablation to non-thermal EMR (vs no ablation) will result in lower lesion recurrence rates at 6-month follow-up, and non-inferior adverse events (AE) rates 14 days post EMR.

For participants with planned EMR, endoscopists will perform non-thermal EMRs as per standard of care and:

* adjuvant thermal ablation will either not be performed (control group), or will be applied to the base and outside margins of the resection site (experimental group); * then, all patients will be contacted 14-44 days after EMR, to verbally ascertain the occurrence of AEs; * then, all patients will undergo a first follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months after initial conoloscopy to assess lesion recurrence; * finally, all patients will undergo a second and final colonoscopy 18 months after EMR.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult patients

Undergoing EMR for large (≥20 mm) colorectal LSL

Providing written and informed consent for study participation

Disqualifiers

Inflammatory bowel disease

Non-elective colonoscopy

Poor general health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >III)

Coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia (international normalized ration ≥1.5 or platelets <50*10^9/L)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Adjuvant thermal ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, submucosal injection (0.9% NaCl with methylene blue solution) using the h-APC probe (ERBEJET 2 attached to Vio3 electrosurgical unit, pressure: 40 bar) will be performed to further expose the resection margin. Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the outside margins of the resection site using the h-APC probe. Adjuvant thermal ablation will then also be applied to the base of the resection site using the h-APC probe. The precise electrocautery mode (PRECISE-APC setting 9) will be used to apply thermal ablation, as previously described for h-APC.

  • No adjuvant thermal ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    After performing non-thermal EMR with thermal ablation, adjuvant thermal ablation will not be performed.

Treatment groups

752 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) + adjuvant thermal ablationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Lesion recurrence rate

Defined as the number of cases with pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated, or adenomatous histology at the tattooed resection site compatible with the study polyp histology divided by the total number of cases.

Time frame
6 months
2

Clinically significant adverse event (AE) rate

Defined as the number of cases with delayed bleeding (blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization, endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) and/or delayed perforation (endoscopic or radiologic evidence of significant air or any luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract) divided by the total number of cases.

Time frame
14 days

Secondary outcomes

1

Any delayed bleeding rate

Defined as the number of cases with blood per rectum, regardless of clinical significance, divided by the total number of cases.

Time frame
14 days
2

Lesion recurrence rate at 18-month follow-up

Defined as the number of cases with pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated, or adenomatous histology at the tattooed resection site compatible with the study polyp histology divided by the total number of cases.

Time frame
18 months

Other outcomes

1

High-grade dysplasia rate at the 18-month follow-up

Defined as the number of cases with high-grade dysplasia on resection scars divided by the total number of cases.

Time frame
18 months
2

Rate of CRC during the 18-month follow-up period

Defined as the number of cases with pathology-confirmed carcinomas divided by the total number of cases.

Time frame
From enrollment to the final follow-up colonoscopy at 18 months
3

Colonoscopies to lesion clearance

Defined as the total number of colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance, which means no histologic recurrence at the resection scar on follow-up.

Time frame
18 months
4

EMR procedure time

Defined as the length of time required for the initial EMR.

Time frame
1 day

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: