Reducing Physical Workload Among Assistant Nurses Through Ergonomic Work Technique Training With or Without Biofeedback

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
AgeNot listed
SponsorLinkoeping University

About this trial

Assistant nurses often develop work-related pain in the back, neck and shoulders because their work involves frequent patient handling and movement. Training in safe patient handling may help reduce pain and injury risk, and biofeedback may further support better work techniques during everyday care work.

This study will test whether workplace-based training in patient handling can reduce musculoskeletal problems among assistant nurses. It will also examine whether adding six weeks of self-managed biofeedback-supported work technique training gives extra benefits compared with patient handling training alone. The study will include 60 assistant nurses with musculoskeletal symptoms, who will be randomly assigned to one of the two training groups. Data will be collected through interviews, physical assessments, questionnaires at baseline, six weeks and six months, and weekly SMS monitoring. Interviews with assistant nurses and managers will also explore how the intervention works in practice, how safe patient handling can be promoted, and what organisational factors support safer working methods.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Female assistant nurses (AN)

Employed in/ work in hospital inpatient care or residential care settings

Employment in south-east Sweden within the counties of Östergötland and Jönköping

Have at least one year of work experience as AN

Disqualifiers

Currently on sick leave;

Are receiving other ongoing treatment for their musculoskeletal condition

Have a disorder considered unrelated to their work

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Group A. Patient handling and movement training

    Other intervention

    Both groups: Participants in Groups A and B will receive individualised ergonomic advice tailored to their work situation and needs. During the first weeks, they will complete a digital educational programme delivered through the county council of Östergötland's educational platform and receive a five-step checklist for safe patient handling and movement (PHM), based on Safe Patient Handling - A Research-Based Guide for an Improved Work Environment. The programme includes theoretical and practical PHM training, with emphasis on risk assessment, safe patient transfers and other physically demanding work tasks. Practical instruction will also be provided in the participants' own workplaces.

  • Group B: Patient handling and movement training plus biofeedback

    Other intervention

    Biofeedback-supported work technique training (Group B): Participants in Group B will additionally receive six weeks of self-administered work technique training supported by biofeedback (Wergonic AB, Tullinge, Sweden). Wearable inertial measurement unit sensors attached to the trunk and upper arm will monitor working postures during routine care work, particularly movements involving the back and neck/shoulder region (34, 35) (Figure 2). When unfavourable postures are detected, the system provides gentle vibrotactile feedback, which increases with less favourable postures and stops when a more ergonomic posture is adopted. After instruction, participants will use the system independently during normal work to practise less physically demanding work techniques. They will complete at least ten sessions of a minimum of 20 minutes over six weeks, with the option to train more frequently or for longer periods.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Group A. Patient handling and movement trainingActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Group B. Patient handling and movement training plus biofeedbackActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pain intensity

Pain: Overall work-related musculoskeletal disorders current pain intensity in the back/neck/shoulder will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain). One score for the whole area.

Time frame
Baseline, 6-week, 6-month
2

Work technique

Participating AN will receive a weekly SMS question: "How well has your work technique functioned this week in relation to safe patient handling and movement? (0 = not at all well; 10 = very well)."

Time frame
During the intervention period, every week from baseline to six months follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

1

Health related quality of life

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L Swedish version (permission to be used Aug. 18, 2026, tracking number 87167). The instrument consists of five questions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression (1 = no problem; 5= unable to extreme problems). The health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions to an index score (0.31 = the worst to 1 = the best) health state. This is one instrument, the results of the instrument is presented as an index score only according to the EQ manual and as commonly used.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
2

EQ-VAS

EQ-VAS (vertical thermometer) (0 = the worst health you can imagine; 100 = the best health you can imagine). (Permission to be used Aug. 18, 2026, tracking number 87167.)

Time frame
Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 month
3

Neck Disability Index

The impact of neck pain on daily life will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (percentage from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater neck-related disability).

Time frame
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
4

QuickDASH-7

Upper limb function will be assessed using the modified QuickDASH-7 (0 = no disability; 100 = most severe disability)

Time frame
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month

Other outcomes

1

Background data, age

Year of birth (open-ended response)

Time frame
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
2

Implementation outcome, IAM

Implementation outcomes will be assessed at 6-week and 6-month follow-up using Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree

Time frame
6 week, 6 month
3

Evaluation of biofeedback training

Evaluation of biofeedback training (Group B only) at 6-week and 6-month follow-up: Participants will complete two six-item questionnaires on vibrotactile biofeedback. The first assesses usefulness, comfort and motivation, based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, and whether repeated use improves interpretation of vibration signals and work technique. Scores are reported as mean values (1-7) or summed scores (6-43), with higher scores indicating more positive experiences.

Time frame
6 week, 6 month
4

Background data from the unit manager, number of employees

At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the number of employees

Time frame
Baseline

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Linkoeping University

Lead sponsor

Region Östergötland

Collaborator

Department of Health, Medicin and Caring Science, Linköping University

Collaborator

Region Jönköping County

Collaborator

AFA försäkring

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: